Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Sell
36
PALC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$49.55
Seasonality move
:
7.03%
Day range:
$49.24 - $49.66
52-week range:
$39.91 - $52.91
Dividend yield:
0.92%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
22.7K
Avg. volume:
15.1K
1-year change:
24.01%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
$49.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 0.92% | -- |
|
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
|
$138.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 1.17% | -- |
|
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
|
$60.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.4% | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
$87.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 1.33% | -- |
|
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
|
$155.80 | -- | -- | -- | $1.34 | 2.35% | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
$92.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.28% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | 1.360 | -- | -- |
|
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
|
-- | 0.975 | -- | -- |
|
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.821 | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | 1.004 | -- | -- |
|
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
|
-- | 0.961 | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.928 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or ESG?
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- ESGFlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or ESG?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 ESGFlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is PALC or ESG More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.064%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or ESG?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or ESG?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- ESGFlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or FDLO?
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- FDLOFidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or FDLO?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 FDLOFidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or FDLO More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF has a beta of 0.854, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.628%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or FDLO?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or FDLO?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- FDLOFidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or FTCS?
First Trust Capital Strength ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Capital Strength ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Capital Strength ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Capital Strength ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than First Trust Capital Strength ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or FTCS More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Capital Strength ETF has a beta of 0.854, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.565%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. First Trust Capital Strength ETF offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Capital Strength ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or FTCS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Capital Strength ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Capital Strength ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Capital Strength ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Capital Strength ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or QUS?
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- QUSSPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or QUS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 QUSSPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or QUS More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.63%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or QUS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or QUS?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- QUSSPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PALC or SPXT?
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is PALC or SPXT More Risky?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.324%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PALC or SPXT?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- SPXTProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Why Buy Domino’s Pizza Stock?
When you think of growth stocks, you probably imagine technology…
Stock Ideas
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 121x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
70
OKLO alert for Jan 6
Oklo [OKLO] is up 10.09% over the past day.
Sell
39
DOGZ alert for Jan 6
Dogness (International) [DOGZ] is up 3.39% over the past day.
Buy
66
DMRC alert for Jan 6
Digimarc [DMRC] is up 1.05% over the past day.
