ARHOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Industria De Diseno Textil SA has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Amrest Holdings SE's net margin of 14.87%. Amrest Holdings SE's return on equity of -1.61% beat Industria De Diseno Textil SA's return on equity of 32.79%.

Amrest Holdings SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Industria De Diseno Textil SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.92%. Given that Industria De Diseno Textil SA has higher upside potential than Amrest Holdings SE, analysts believe Industria De Diseno Textil SA is more attractive than Amrest Holdings SE.

Amrest Holdings SE has a beta of 0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 98.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Industria De Diseno Textil SA has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.018%.

Amrest Holdings SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Industria De Diseno Textil SA offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Amrest Holdings SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Industria De Diseno Textil SA pays out 69.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Industria De Diseno Textil SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amrest Holdings SE quarterly revenues are $725.2M, which are smaller than Industria De Diseno Textil SA quarterly revenues of $10.7B. Amrest Holdings SE's net income of $28.9M is lower than Industria De Diseno Textil SA's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Amrest Holdings SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while Industria De Diseno Textil SA's PE ratio is 26.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amrest Holdings SE is 0.68x versus 4.01x for Industria De Diseno Textil SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neinor Homes SA has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Amrest Holdings SE's net margin of --. Amrest Holdings SE's return on equity of -1.61% beat Neinor Homes SA's return on equity of 9.94%.

Amrest Holdings SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neinor Homes SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amrest Holdings SE has higher upside potential than Neinor Homes SA, analysts believe Amrest Holdings SE is more attractive than Neinor Homes SA.

Amrest Holdings SE has a beta of 0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 98.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neinor Homes SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amrest Holdings SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Neinor Homes SA offers a yield of 13.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Amrest Holdings SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neinor Homes SA pays out 38.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Neinor Homes SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amrest Holdings SE quarterly revenues are $725.2M, which are larger than Neinor Homes SA quarterly revenues of --. Amrest Holdings SE's net income of $28.9M is higher than Neinor Homes SA's net income of --. Notably, Amrest Holdings SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while Neinor Homes SA's PE ratio is 9.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amrest Holdings SE is 0.68x versus 1.50x for Neinor Homes SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melia Hotels International SA has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Amrest Holdings SE's net margin of 12.82%. Amrest Holdings SE's return on equity of -1.61% beat Melia Hotels International SA's return on equity of 21.69%.

Amrest Holdings SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melia Hotels International SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amrest Holdings SE has higher upside potential than Melia Hotels International SA, analysts believe Amrest Holdings SE is more attractive than Melia Hotels International SA.

Amrest Holdings SE has a beta of 0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 98.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melia Hotels International SA has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.415%.

Amrest Holdings SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Melia Hotels International SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amrest Holdings SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melia Hotels International SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amrest Holdings SE quarterly revenues are $725.2M, which are larger than Melia Hotels International SA quarterly revenues of $642.4M. Amrest Holdings SE's net income of $28.9M is lower than Melia Hotels International SA's net income of $82.4M. Notably, Amrest Holdings SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while Melia Hotels International SA's PE ratio is 11.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amrest Holdings SE is 0.68x versus 0.79x for Melia Hotels International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vidrala SA has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Amrest Holdings SE's net margin of --. Amrest Holdings SE's return on equity of -1.61% beat Vidrala SA's return on equity of --.

Amrest Holdings SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vidrala SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amrest Holdings SE has higher upside potential than Vidrala SA, analysts believe Amrest Holdings SE is more attractive than Vidrala SA.

Amrest Holdings SE has a beta of 0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 98.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vidrala SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amrest Holdings SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Vidrala SA offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Amrest Holdings SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vidrala SA pays out 16.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Vidrala SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amrest Holdings SE quarterly revenues are $725.2M, which are larger than Vidrala SA quarterly revenues of --. Amrest Holdings SE's net income of $28.9M is lower than Vidrala SA's net income of $167.9M. Notably, Amrest Holdings SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.09x while Vidrala SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amrest Holdings SE is 0.68x versus -- for Vidrala SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.