Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
35
BHPLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.19
Seasonality move
:
1.01%
Day range:
$24.19 - $24.76
52-week range:
$23.00 - $35.60
Dividend yield:
6.03%
P/E ratio:
15.56x
P/S ratio:
2.21x
P/B ratio:
2.83x
Volume:
7.1K
Avg. volume:
205.1K
1-year change:
-28.61%
Market cap:
$122.7B
Revenue:
$55.7B
EPS (TTM):
$1.56
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHPLF
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHPLF
BHP Group
|
$24.20 | -- | $122.7B | 15.56x | $0.74 | 6.03% | 2.21x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.18x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
$0.06 | -- | $16.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.89x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
$12.99 | -- | $59.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
$0.12 | -- | $42.9M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 165.95% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHPLF
BHP Group
|
28.87% | 0.801 | 11.7% | 1.27x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
9.38% | 0.068 | 6.83% | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
38.76% | 0.000 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | 4.553 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHPLF
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | 11.7% | 16.54% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BHP Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BHPLF or FTZZF?
Fertoz has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 16.54% beat Fertoz's return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHPLFBHP Group-- -- $66.7B FTZZFFertoz-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About BHPLF or FTZZF?
BHP Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fertoz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Fertoz, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Fertoz.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHPLFBHP Group0 0 0 FTZZFFertoz0 0 0 -
Is BHPLF or FTZZF More Risky?
BHP Group has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.777% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fertoz has a beta of -0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.613%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHPLF or FTZZF?
BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Fertoz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Fertoz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHPLF or FTZZF?
BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fertoz quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Fertoz's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Fertoz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.21x versus 1.18x for Fertoz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHPLFBHP Group2.21x 15.56x -- -- FTZZFFertoz1.18x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHPLF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 16.54% beat Harvest Minerals's return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHPLFBHP Group-- -- $66.7B HMIFFHarvest Minerals-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About BHPLF or HMIFF?
BHP Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Harvest Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHPLFBHP Group0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals0 0 0 -
Is BHPLF or HMIFF More Risky?
BHP Group has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.777% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHPLF or HMIFF?
BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Harvest Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHPLF or HMIFF?
BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Harvest Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.21x versus 4.89x for Harvest Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHPLFBHP Group2.21x 15.56x -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals4.89x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHPLF or NVA?
Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 16.54% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHPLFBHP Group-- -- $66.7B NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BHPLF or NVA?
BHP Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.46%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than BHP Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHPLFBHP Group0 0 0 NVANova Minerals0 0 0 -
Is BHPLF or NVA More Risky?
BHP Group has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.777% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHPLF or NVA?
BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHPLF or NVA?
BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.21x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHPLFBHP Group2.21x 15.56x -- -- NVANova Minerals-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHPLF or SBMSF?
Danakali has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 16.54% beat Danakali's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHPLFBHP Group-- -- $66.7B SBMSFDanakali-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BHPLF or SBMSF?
BHP Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Danakali, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Danakali.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHPLFBHP Group0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali0 0 0 -
Is BHPLF or SBMSF More Risky?
BHP Group has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.777% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali has a beta of 1.672, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.245%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHPLF or SBMSF?
BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Danakali offers a yield of 165.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHPLF or SBMSF?
BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Danakali's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Danakali's PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.21x versus -- for Danakali. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHPLFBHP Group2.21x 15.56x -- -- SBMSFDanakali-- 47.38x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 6.55% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 1.98% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 3.2% over the past day.
