CICHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The9 has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of --. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat The9's return on equity of --.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than The9.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.061, which suggesting that the stock is 93.912% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.461%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.76%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 1.90x versus 2.67x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of 17.88%. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's return on equity of 9.37%.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.061, which suggesting that the stock is 93.912% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China has a beta of 0.408, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.219%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.76%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China offers a yield of 6.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China pays out 78.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are smaller than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China quarterly revenues of $34.8B. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's net income of $6.2B. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China's PE ratio is 6.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 1.90x versus 0.85x for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of 17.57%. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $8.03 which suggests that it could grow by 21.48%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than China Construction Bank, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than China Construction Bank.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.061, which suggesting that the stock is 93.912% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.894%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.76%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 36.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 1.90x versus 3.16x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.