FETM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ChoiceOne Financial Services has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Fentura Financial's net margin of 29.26%. Fentura Financial's return on equity of 7.52% beat ChoiceOne Financial Services's return on equity of 11.89%.

Fentura Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ChoiceOne Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.11%. Given that ChoiceOne Financial Services has higher upside potential than Fentura Financial, analysts believe ChoiceOne Financial Services is more attractive than Fentura Financial.

Fentura Financial has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChoiceOne Financial Services has a beta of 0.633, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.696%.

Fentura Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. ChoiceOne Financial Services offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Fentura Financial pays 12.2% of its earnings as a dividend. ChoiceOne Financial Services pays out 37.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fentura Financial quarterly revenues are $13.6M, which are smaller than ChoiceOne Financial Services quarterly revenues of $25.1M. Fentura Financial's net income of $867K is lower than ChoiceOne Financial Services's net income of $7.3M. Notably, Fentura Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.14x while ChoiceOne Financial Services's PE ratio is 11.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fentura Financial is 3.50x versus 3.13x for ChoiceOne Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Fentura Financial's net margin of 16.32%. Fentura Financial's return on equity of 7.52% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Fentura Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.17%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Fentura Financial, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Fentura Financial.

Fentura Financial has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Fentura Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Fentura Financial pays 12.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fentura Financial quarterly revenues are $13.6M, which are smaller than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Fentura Financial's net income of $867K is lower than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Fentura Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.14x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fentura Financial is 3.50x versus 2.89x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Fentura Financial's net margin of 27.77%. Fentura Financial's return on equity of 7.52% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Fentura Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.43%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Fentura Financial, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Fentura Financial.

Fentura Financial has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Fentura Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Park National offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Fentura Financial pays 12.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fentura Financial quarterly revenues are $13.6M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Fentura Financial's net income of $867K is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Fentura Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.14x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fentura Financial is 3.50x versus 5.72x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Fentura Financial's net margin of 24.66%. Fentura Financial's return on equity of 7.52% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Fentura Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.38%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Fentura Financial, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Fentura Financial.

Fentura Financial has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.046%.

Fentura Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Fentura Financial pays 12.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Fentura Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Fentura Financial quarterly revenues are $13.6M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Fentura Financial's net income of $867K is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Fentura Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.14x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fentura Financial is 3.50x versus 3.37x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.