Financhill
Buy
64

FNEVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.12
Seasonality move :
-11.56%
Day range:
$1.12 - $1.12
52-week range:
$0.75 - $1.14
Dividend yield:
3.66%
P/E ratio:
14.47x
P/S ratio:
1.01x
P/B ratio:
0.73x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
45.45%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$1.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.08

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FNEVF
Fraser and Neave
-- -- -- -- --
BUMTF
Bumitama Agri
-- -- -- -- --
DTCK
Davis Commodities
-- -- -- -- --
GNS
Genius Group
-- -- -- -- --
PEFDF
Delfi
-- -- -- -- --
WLMIY
Wilmar International
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FNEVF
Fraser and Neave
$1.12 -- $1.6B 14.47x $0.01 3.66% 1.01x
BUMTF
Bumitama Agri
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
DTCK
Davis Commodities
$1.07 -- $26.2M 70.09x $0.00 0% 0.16x
GNS
Genius Group
$0.73 -- $15.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.42x
PEFDF
Delfi
$0.58 -- $354.5M 8.72x $0.02 6.55% 0.69x
WLMIY
Wilmar International
$22.82 -- $14.2B 8.98x $0.46 5.57% 0.22x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FNEVF
Fraser and Neave
28.91% -0.295 52.6% 1.24x
BUMTF
Bumitama Agri
-- 0.000 -- --
DTCK
Davis Commodities
3.55% -0.721 1.5% 0.93x
GNS
Genius Group
10.21% 2.468 8.44% 2.41x
PEFDF
Delfi
11.05% -0.344 8.22% 1.24x
WLMIY
Wilmar International
57.56% 0.112 161.05% 0.64x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FNEVF
Fraser and Neave
-- -- 3.34% 4.47% -- --
BUMTF
Bumitama Agri
-- -- -- -- -- --
DTCK
Davis Commodities
-- -- 4.48% 4.72% -- --
GNS
Genius Group
-- -- -12.42% -15.41% -- --
PEFDF
Delfi
-- -- 13.91% 15.49% -- --
WLMIY
Wilmar International
-- -- 3% 6.96% -- --

Fraser and Neave vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or BUMTF?

    Bumitama Agri has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Bumitama Agri's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    -- -- $3.5B
    BUMTF
    Bumitama Agri
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or BUMTF?

    Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bumitama Agri has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fraser and Neave has higher upside potential than Bumitama Agri, analysts believe Fraser and Neave is more attractive than Bumitama Agri.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    0 0 0
    BUMTF
    Bumitama Agri
    0 0 0
  • Is FNEVF or BUMTF More Risky?

    Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bumitama Agri has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or BUMTF?

    Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Bumitama Agri offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Bumitama Agri pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fraser and Neave's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or BUMTF?

    Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bumitama Agri quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Bumitama Agri's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Bumitama Agri's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus -- for Bumitama Agri. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    1.01x 14.47x -- --
    BUMTF
    Bumitama Agri
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or DTCK?

    Davis Commodities has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Davis Commodities's return on equity of 4.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    -- -- $3.5B
    DTCK
    Davis Commodities
    -- -- $12M
  • What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or DTCK?

    Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Davis Commodities has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fraser and Neave has higher upside potential than Davis Commodities, analysts believe Fraser and Neave is more attractive than Davis Commodities.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    0 0 0
    DTCK
    Davis Commodities
    0 0 0
  • Is FNEVF or DTCK More Risky?

    Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Davis Commodities has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or DTCK?

    Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Davis Commodities offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Davis Commodities pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fraser and Neave's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or DTCK?

    Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Davis Commodities quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Davis Commodities's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Davis Commodities's PE ratio is 70.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus 0.16x for Davis Commodities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    1.01x 14.47x -- --
    DTCK
    Davis Commodities
    0.16x 70.09x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or GNS?

    Genius Group has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Genius Group's return on equity of -15.41%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    -- -- $3.5B
    GNS
    Genius Group
    -- -- $60.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or GNS?

    Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genius Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1269.86%. Given that Genius Group has higher upside potential than Fraser and Neave, analysts believe Genius Group is more attractive than Fraser and Neave.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    0 0 0
    GNS
    Genius Group
    0 0 0
  • Is FNEVF or GNS More Risky?

    Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genius Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or GNS?

    Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Genius Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Genius Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fraser and Neave's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or GNS?

    Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Genius Group quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Genius Group's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Genius Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus 0.42x for Genius Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    1.01x 14.47x -- --
    GNS
    Genius Group
    0.42x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or PEFDF?

    Delfi has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Delfi's return on equity of 15.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    -- -- $3.5B
    PEFDF
    Delfi
    -- -- $291.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or PEFDF?

    Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Delfi has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fraser and Neave has higher upside potential than Delfi, analysts believe Fraser and Neave is more attractive than Delfi.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    0 0 0
    PEFDF
    Delfi
    0 0 0
  • Is FNEVF or PEFDF More Risky?

    Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delfi has a beta of 0.048, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.181%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or PEFDF?

    Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Delfi offers a yield of 6.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Delfi pays out 62.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or PEFDF?

    Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Delfi quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Delfi's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Delfi's PE ratio is 8.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus 0.69x for Delfi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    1.01x 14.47x -- --
    PEFDF
    Delfi
    0.69x 8.72x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FNEVF or WLMIY?

    Wilmar International has a net margin of -- compared to Fraser and Neave's net margin of --. Fraser and Neave's return on equity of 4.47% beat Wilmar International's return on equity of 6.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    -- -- $3.5B
    WLMIY
    Wilmar International
    -- -- $49.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About FNEVF or WLMIY?

    Fraser and Neave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wilmar International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fraser and Neave has higher upside potential than Wilmar International, analysts believe Fraser and Neave is more attractive than Wilmar International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    0 0 0
    WLMIY
    Wilmar International
    0 0 0
  • Is FNEVF or WLMIY More Risky?

    Fraser and Neave has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.559% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wilmar International has a beta of 0.674, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.623%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNEVF or WLMIY?

    Fraser and Neave has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Wilmar International offers a yield of 5.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Fraser and Neave pays 53.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Wilmar International pays out 52.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FNEVF or WLMIY?

    Fraser and Neave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wilmar International quarterly revenues of --. Fraser and Neave's net income of -- is lower than Wilmar International's net income of --. Notably, Fraser and Neave's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Wilmar International's PE ratio is 8.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fraser and Neave is 1.01x versus 0.22x for Wilmar International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FNEVF
    Fraser and Neave
    1.01x 14.47x -- --
    WLMIY
    Wilmar International
    0.22x 8.98x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?

With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…

Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?

If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Stock Ideas

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.

Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7

Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 10.89% over the past day.

Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7

Alico [ALCO] is down 3.89% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock