FRZA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Camping World Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Forza X1's net margin of 0.32%. Forza X1's return on equity of -- beat Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2%.

Forza X1 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2400%. On the other hand Camping World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.82%. Given that Forza X1 has higher upside potential than Camping World Holdings, analysts believe Forza X1 is more attractive than Camping World Holdings.

Forza X1 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.313%.

Forza X1 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Camping World Holdings offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Forza X1 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Camping World Holdings pays out 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Forza X1 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Forza X1's net income of -$895.7K is lower than Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Forza X1's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Camping World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forza X1 is -- versus 0.27x for Camping World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of -- compared to Forza X1's net margin of 3.59%. Forza X1's return on equity of -- beat Envela's return on equity of 13.11%.

Forza X1 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2400%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Forza X1 has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe Forza X1 is more attractive than Envela.

Forza X1 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.983%.

Forza X1 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forza X1 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forza X1 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Envela quarterly revenues of $46.9M. Forza X1's net income of -$895.7K is lower than Envela's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Forza X1's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envela's PE ratio is 30.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forza X1 is -- versus 1.18x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazydays Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Forza X1's net margin of -8.28%. Forza X1's return on equity of -- beat Lazydays Holdings's return on equity of -95.45%.

Forza X1 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2400%. On the other hand Lazydays Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1104.82%. Given that Forza X1 has higher upside potential than Lazydays Holdings, analysts believe Forza X1 is more attractive than Lazydays Holdings.

Forza X1 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazydays Holdings has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.132%.

Forza X1 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lazydays Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forza X1 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lazydays Holdings pays out -4.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Forza X1 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lazydays Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.5M. Forza X1's net income of -$895.7K is higher than Lazydays Holdings's net income of -$17.7M. Notably, Forza X1's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lazydays Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forza X1 is -- versus 0.01x for Lazydays Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarineMax has a net margin of -- compared to Forza X1's net margin of 0.71%. Forza X1's return on equity of -- beat MarineMax's return on equity of 4%.

Forza X1 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2400%. On the other hand MarineMax has an analysts' consensus of $39.63 which suggests that it could grow by 39.77%. Given that Forza X1 has higher upside potential than MarineMax, analysts believe Forza X1 is more attractive than MarineMax.

Forza X1 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarineMax has a beta of 1.866, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.554%.

Forza X1 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarineMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forza X1 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarineMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forza X1 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MarineMax quarterly revenues of $563.1M. Forza X1's net income of -$895.7K is lower than MarineMax's net income of $4M. Notably, Forza X1's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarineMax's PE ratio is 17.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forza X1 is -- versus 0.27x for MarineMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.