IIJIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KDDI has a net margin of 5.53% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of 12.74%. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.18% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.1%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than KDDI.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.078% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.053, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.652%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $505M, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $27.9M is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.49x while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.65x versus 1.69x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of 5.53% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of 8.46%. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.18% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 12.71%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.57%. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.078% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.136, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.403%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $505M, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $27.9M is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.49x while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.65x versus 0.91x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoftBank Group has a net margin of 5.53% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of 13.17%. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.18% beat SoftBank Group's return on equity of -2.37%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SoftBank Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than SoftBank Group, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than SoftBank Group.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.078% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoftBank Group has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.471%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. SoftBank Group offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. SoftBank Group pays out -28.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $505M, which are smaller than SoftBank Group quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $27.9M is lower than SoftBank Group's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.49x while SoftBank Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.65x versus 1.78x for SoftBank Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 5.53% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of --. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.18% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.078% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $505M, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $27.9M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.49x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.65x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.