Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
45
LBGUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$53.11
Seasonality move
:
2.36%
Day range:
$53.11 - $53.11
52-week range:
$48.00 - $53.11
Dividend yield:
0.76%
P/E ratio:
14.68x
P/S ratio:
4.46x
P/B ratio:
1.17x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
10.64%
Market cap:
$13.2B
Revenue:
$2.9B
EPS (TTM):
$3.62
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBGUF
L E Lundbergforetagen AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYNO
byNordic Acquisition
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EQBBF
EQT AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVSBF
Investor AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEFFF
VEF AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VSTKF
VNV Global AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBGUF
L E Lundbergforetagen AB
|
$53.11 | -- | $13.2B | 14.68x | $0.40 | 0.76% | 4.46x |
|
BYNO
byNordic Acquisition
|
$11.42 | -- | $87.9M | 467.76x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
EQBBF
EQT AB
|
$29.57 | -- | $35B | 111.63x | $0.16 | 1.13% | 14.80x |
|
IVSBF
Investor AB
|
$26.60 | -- | $81.5B | 4.19x | $0.11 | 1.67% | 3.29x |
|
VEFFF
VEF AB
|
$0.20 | -- | $223.9M | 3.35x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VSTKF
VNV Global AB
|
$2.42 | -- | $317M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBGUF
L E Lundbergforetagen AB
|
-- | -0.194 | -- | 0.00x |
|
BYNO
byNordic Acquisition
|
-- | 0.015 | -- | -- |
|
EQBBF
EQT AB
|
21.02% | 2.541 | 6.28% | 5.97x |
|
IVSBF
Investor AB
|
10.08% | 1.212 | 10.13% | -- |
|
VEFFF
VEF AB
|
7.56% | -0.294 | 15.79% | 12.65x |
|
VSTKF
VNV Global AB
|
12.9% | 0.006 | 26.84% | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBGUF
L E Lundbergforetagen AB
|
-- | $173.5M | 5.69% | 5.83% | 47.45% | $8M |
|
BYNO
byNordic Acquisition
|
-- | -$491.1K | -- | -- | -- | -$390.3K |
|
EQBBF
EQT AB
|
-- | -- | 3.4% | 4.45% | -- | -- |
|
IVSBF
Investor AB
|
-- | -- | 23.57% | 26.38% | 50.98% | -- |
|
VEFFF
VEF AB
|
-- | $41.3M | 10.89% | 11.63% | 92.84% | -$1.6M |
|
VSTKF
VNV Global AB
|
-- | -- | -17.97% | -21.17% | 94.24% | -$1.9M |
L E Lundbergforetagen AB vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or BYNO?
byNordic Acquisition has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of --. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat byNordic Acquisition's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B BYNObyNordic Acquisition-- -$0.02 -- -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or BYNO?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand byNordic Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than byNordic Acquisition, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than byNordic Acquisition.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 BYNObyNordic Acquisition0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or BYNO More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison byNordic Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or BYNO?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. byNordic Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. byNordic Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or BYNO?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are larger than byNordic Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is higher than byNordic Acquisition's net income of -$206.2K. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.68x while byNordic Acquisition's PE ratio is 467.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 4.46x versus -- for byNordic Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB4.46x 14.68x $664.3M $206.7M BYNObyNordic Acquisition-- 467.76x -- -$206.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or EQBBF?
EQT AB has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of --. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat EQT AB's return on equity of 4.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B EQBBFEQT AB-- -- $10.2B -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or EQBBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EQT AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than EQT AB, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than EQT AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 EQBBFEQT AB0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or EQBBF More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EQT AB has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.805%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or EQBBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. EQT AB offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. EQT AB pays out 229.72% of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT AB's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or EQBBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are larger than EQT AB quarterly revenues of --. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is higher than EQT AB's net income of --. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.68x while EQT AB's PE ratio is 111.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 4.46x versus 14.80x for EQT AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB4.46x 14.68x $664.3M $206.7M EQBBFEQT AB14.80x 111.63x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or IVSBF?
Investor AB has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of 48.43%. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat Investor AB's return on equity of 26.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B IVSBFInvestor AB-- $0.40 $93.5B -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or IVSBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Investor AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than Investor AB, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than Investor AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 IVSBFInvestor AB0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or IVSBF More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Investor AB has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.996%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or IVSBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Investor AB offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Investor AB pays out 10.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or IVSBF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are smaller than Investor AB quarterly revenues of $2.5B. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is lower than Investor AB's net income of $1.2B. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.68x while Investor AB's PE ratio is 4.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 4.46x versus 3.29x for Investor AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB4.46x 14.68x $664.3M $206.7M IVSBFInvestor AB3.29x 4.19x $2.5B $1.2B
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or VEFFF?
VEF AB has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of 89.8%. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat VEF AB's return on equity of 11.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B VEFFFVEF AB-- $0.04 $513.8M -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or VEFFF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VEF AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than VEF AB, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than VEF AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 VEFFFVEF AB0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or VEFFF More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VEF AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or VEFFF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. VEF AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. VEF AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or VEFFF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are larger than VEF AB quarterly revenues of $42.6M. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is higher than VEF AB's net income of $38.2M. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.68x while VEF AB's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 4.46x versus -- for VEF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB4.46x 14.68x $664.3M $206.7M VEFFFVEF AB-- 3.35x $42.6M $38.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns LBGUF or VSTKF?
VNV Global AB has a net margin of 31.11% compared to L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net margin of 99.11%. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's return on equity of 5.83% beat VNV Global AB's return on equity of -21.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB-- $0.83 $16.4B VSTKFVNV Global AB-- -$0.20 $659.6M -
What do Analysts Say About LBGUF or VSTKF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNV Global AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L E Lundbergforetagen AB has higher upside potential than VNV Global AB, analysts believe L E Lundbergforetagen AB is more attractive than VNV Global AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB0 0 0 VSTKFVNV Global AB0 0 0 -
Is LBGUF or VSTKF More Risky?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNV Global AB has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.281%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBGUF or VSTKF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. VNV Global AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L E Lundbergforetagen AB pays 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. VNV Global AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBGUF or VSTKF?
L E Lundbergforetagen AB quarterly revenues are $664.3M, which are larger than VNV Global AB quarterly revenues of -$25.8M. L E Lundbergforetagen AB's net income of $206.7M is higher than VNV Global AB's net income of -$25.6M. Notably, L E Lundbergforetagen AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.68x while VNV Global AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L E Lundbergforetagen AB is 4.46x versus -- for VNV Global AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBGUFL E Lundbergforetagen AB4.46x 14.68x $664.3M $206.7M VSTKFVNV Global AB-- -- -$25.8M -$25.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 5.45% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 4.26% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 2.2% over the past day.
