MIELY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Mitsubishi Electric's net margin of 3.46%. Mitsubishi Electric's return on equity of 7.57% beat Kawasaki Heavy Industries's return on equity of 4.04%.

Mitsubishi Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kawasaki Heavy Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Electric has higher upside potential than Kawasaki Heavy Industries, analysts believe Mitsubishi Electric is more attractive than Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

Mitsubishi Electric has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.965, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.517%.

Mitsubishi Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Kawasaki Heavy Industries offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Mitsubishi Electric pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kawasaki Heavy Industries pays out 52.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Electric quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Kawasaki Heavy Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Mitsubishi Electric's net income of $315.2M is higher than Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net income of $98.6M. Notably, Mitsubishi Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.78x while Kawasaki Heavy Industries's PE ratio is 34.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Electric is 0.98x versus 0.56x for Kawasaki Heavy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Mitsubishi Electric's net margin of 7.38%. Mitsubishi Electric's return on equity of 7.57% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11%.

Mitsubishi Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.64%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Electric, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Mitsubishi Electric.

Mitsubishi Electric has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.095%.

Mitsubishi Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Mitsubishi Electric pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Electric quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Mitsubishi Electric's net income of $315.2M is higher than Kyocera's net income of $236M. Notably, Mitsubishi Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.78x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 20.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Electric is 0.98x versus 1.02x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Mitsubishi Electric's net margin of 5.6%. Mitsubishi Electric's return on equity of 7.57% beat Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.84%.

Mitsubishi Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Electric has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, analysts believe Mitsubishi Electric is more attractive than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Mitsubishi Electric has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mitsubishi Electric pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays out 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Electric quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Mitsubishi Electric's net income of $315.2M is lower than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $399.6M. Notably, Mitsubishi Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.78x while Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's PE ratio is 31.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Electric is 0.98x versus 1.50x for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Mitsubishi Electric's net margin of 5.34%. Mitsubishi Electric's return on equity of 7.57% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Mitsubishi Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 77.13%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Electric, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Mitsubishi Electric.

Mitsubishi Electric has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi Electric pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Electric quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Mitsubishi Electric's net income of $315.2M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Mitsubishi Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.78x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 14.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Electric is 0.98x versus 2.86x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.