MSBHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Mitsubishi's net margin of -1471.96%. Mitsubishi's return on equity of 9.96% beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

Mitsubishi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

Mitsubishi has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 44.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4354.363%.

Mitsubishi has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi pays 30.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi quarterly revenues are $30.1B, which are larger than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. Mitsubishi's net income of $2.3B is higher than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Mitsubishi's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.26x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi is 0.52x versus 22.60x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Mitsubishi's net margin of 6.75%. Mitsubishi's return on equity of 9.96% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

Mitsubishi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.38%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Mitsubishi.

Mitsubishi has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.058%.

Mitsubishi has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Mitsubishi pays 30.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 22.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi quarterly revenues are $30.1B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Mitsubishi's net income of $2.3B is higher than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, Mitsubishi's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.26x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi is 0.52x versus 0.67x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Mitsubishi's net margin of 7.38%. Mitsubishi's return on equity of 9.96% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11%.

Mitsubishi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.22%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Mitsubishi.

Mitsubishi has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.095%.

Mitsubishi has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Mitsubishi pays 30.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi quarterly revenues are $30.1B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Mitsubishi's net income of $2.3B is higher than Kyocera's net income of $236M. Notably, Mitsubishi's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.26x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi is 0.52x versus 1.01x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Mitsubishi's net margin of 5.34%. Mitsubishi's return on equity of 9.96% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Mitsubishi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 104.84%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Mitsubishi.

Mitsubishi has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi pays 30.44% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi quarterly revenues are $30.1B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Mitsubishi's net income of $2.3B is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Mitsubishi's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.26x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 12.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi is 0.52x versus 2.47x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.