PROSY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Koninklijke KPN NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of 16.51%. Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13% beat Koninklijke KPN NV's return on equity of 46.96%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Koninklijke KPN NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that Koninklijke KPN NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe Koninklijke KPN NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koninklijke KPN NV has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.688%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Koninklijke KPN NV offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Prosus NV pays 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke KPN NV pays out 69.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Koninklijke KPN NV quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Koninklijke KPN NV's net income of $244.4M. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Koninklijke KPN NV's PE ratio is 9.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 17.68x versus 2.47x for Koninklijke KPN NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of -217.55%. Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of -4.57%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.97%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.045%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prosus NV pays 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $43.3M. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$94.2M. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 267.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 17.68x versus 0.89x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Music Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of --. Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13% beat Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 51.03%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Music Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prosus NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Prosus NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Universal Music Group NV offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Prosus NV pays 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV pays out 73.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues of --. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Universal Music Group NV's net income of --. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Universal Music Group NV's PE ratio is 28.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 17.68x versus 3.82x for Universal Music Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VEON has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of 6.62%. Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13% beat VEON's return on equity of --.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VEON has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.72%. Given that VEON has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe VEON is more attractive than Prosus NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VEON has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.443%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. VEON offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prosus NV pays 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. VEON pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VEON quarterly revenues of $1B. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than VEON's net income of $68M. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while VEON's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 17.68x versus 0.69x for VEON. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.