Is Tenable Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Tenable (NASDAQ:TENB) is a cybersecurity company with a focus on…
Buy
72
PTOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0200
Seasonality move
:
46.35%
Day range:
$0.0200 - $0.0200
52-week range:
$0.0019 - $0.0200
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
35.10x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
23.9K
1-year change:
191.97%
Market cap:
$1.4M
Revenue:
$166.3K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTOS
P2 Solar
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$1.3B | $0.16 | -6.52% | -64.13% | $29.71 |
|
AXTI
AXT
|
$25.9M | -$0.06 | -16.33% | -176% | $5.00 |
|
CSIQ
Canadian Solar
|
$1.9B | -- | 24.58% | -1105.6% | $15.52 |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$31.3M | $0.08 | -5.91% | -40% | $12.67 |
|
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
|
$3M | -$5.41 | 118.73% | -99.59% | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTOS
P2 Solar
|
$0.0200 | -- | $1.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 35.10x |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$19.42 | $29.71 | $4.8B | 13.58x | $0.08 | 1.66% | 0.76x |
|
AXTI
AXT
|
$1.68 | $5.00 | $76.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.73x |
|
CSIQ
Canadian Solar
|
$9.96 | $15.52 | $659.1M | 24.76x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.11x |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$7.51 | $12.67 | $92.9M | 32.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.70x |
|
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
|
$2.16 | -- | $879.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTOS
P2 Solar
|
-244.81% | -0.452 | 672.12% | 0.00x |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
21.84% | 1.508 | 18.2% | 1.86x |
|
AXTI
AXT
|
19.69% | 2.031 | 30.57% | 0.65x |
|
CSIQ
Canadian Solar
|
66.66% | 1.203 | 253.18% | 0.58x |
|
INTT
inTest
|
13.09% | 0.411 | 14.14% | 1.54x |
|
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
|
26.36% | -2.113 | 122.04% | 0.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTOS
P2 Solar
|
$3.7K | -$19.8K | -- | -- | -1895.38% | -$35.9K |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$246.7M | $134.4M | 6.75% | 8.64% | 9.37% | $251.9M |
|
AXTI
AXT
|
$4.4M | -$3.9M | -3.7% | -4.41% | -20.82% | $1.1M |
|
CSIQ
Canadian Solar
|
$247.4M | $294K | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.91% | -$715.5M |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$14.5M | $2.1M | 2.49% | 2.92% | 5.56% | $2.4M |
|
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
|
$1.7M | -$3.8M | -197.89% | -252.61% | -1.69% | -$7.6M |
P2 Solar vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PTOS or AMKR?
Amkor Technology has a net margin of -2121.94% compared to P2 Solar's net margin of 6.49%. P2 Solar's return on equity of -- beat Amkor Technology's return on equity of 8.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTOSP2 Solar43.33% -- -$541K AMKRAmkor Technology15.14% $0.43 $5.3B -
What do Analysts Say About PTOS or AMKR?
P2 Solar has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amkor Technology has an analysts' consensus of $29.71 which suggests that it could grow by 53.01%. Given that Amkor Technology has higher upside potential than P2 Solar, analysts believe Amkor Technology is more attractive than P2 Solar.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTOSP2 Solar0 0 0 AMKRAmkor Technology3 3 0 -
Is PTOS or AMKR More Risky?
P2 Solar has a beta of 11.574, which suggesting that the stock is 1057.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amkor Technology has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.463%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTOS or AMKR?
P2 Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amkor Technology offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. P2 Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology pays out 50.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTOS or AMKR?
P2 Solar quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than Amkor Technology quarterly revenues of $1.6B. P2 Solar's net income of -$78.5K is lower than Amkor Technology's net income of $105.6M. Notably, P2 Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amkor Technology's PE ratio is 13.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P2 Solar is 35.10x versus 0.76x for Amkor Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTOSP2 Solar35.10x -- $3.7K -$78.5K AMKRAmkor Technology0.76x 13.58x $1.6B $105.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTOS or AXTI?
AXT has a net margin of -2121.94% compared to P2 Solar's net margin of -20.27%. P2 Solar's return on equity of -- beat AXT's return on equity of -4.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTOSP2 Solar43.33% -- -$541K AXTIAXT17.56% -$0.12 $302.2M -
What do Analysts Say About PTOS or AXTI?
P2 Solar has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 197.62%. Given that AXT has higher upside potential than P2 Solar, analysts believe AXT is more attractive than P2 Solar.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTOSP2 Solar0 0 0 AXTIAXT4 0 0 -
Is PTOS or AXTI More Risky?
P2 Solar has a beta of 11.574, which suggesting that the stock is 1057.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 2.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.76%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTOS or AXTI?
P2 Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. P2 Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTOS or AXTI?
P2 Solar quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than AXT quarterly revenues of $25.1M. P2 Solar's net income of -$78.5K is higher than AXT's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, P2 Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P2 Solar is 35.10x versus 0.73x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTOSP2 Solar35.10x -- $3.7K -$78.5K AXTIAXT0.73x -- $25.1M -$5.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTOS or CSIQ?
Canadian Solar has a net margin of -2121.94% compared to P2 Solar's net margin of -0.93%. P2 Solar's return on equity of -- beat Canadian Solar's return on equity of 0.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTOSP2 Solar43.33% -- -$541K CSIQCanadian Solar16.41% -$0.31 $9.8B -
What do Analysts Say About PTOS or CSIQ?
P2 Solar has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Solar has an analysts' consensus of $15.52 which suggests that it could grow by 55.77%. Given that Canadian Solar has higher upside potential than P2 Solar, analysts believe Canadian Solar is more attractive than P2 Solar.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTOSP2 Solar0 0 0 CSIQCanadian Solar4 2 1 -
Is PTOS or CSIQ More Risky?
P2 Solar has a beta of 11.574, which suggesting that the stock is 1057.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Solar has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.346%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTOS or CSIQ?
P2 Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. P2 Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTOS or CSIQ?
P2 Solar quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than Canadian Solar quarterly revenues of $1.5B. P2 Solar's net income of -$78.5K is higher than Canadian Solar's net income of -$14M. Notably, P2 Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canadian Solar's PE ratio is 24.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P2 Solar is 35.10x versus 0.11x for Canadian Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTOSP2 Solar35.10x -- $3.7K -$78.5K CSIQCanadian Solar0.11x 24.76x $1.5B -$14M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTOS or INTT?
inTest has a net margin of -2121.94% compared to P2 Solar's net margin of 4.11%. P2 Solar's return on equity of -- beat inTest's return on equity of 2.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTOSP2 Solar43.33% -- -$541K INTTinTest39.72% $0.12 $114.8M -
What do Analysts Say About PTOS or INTT?
P2 Solar has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $12.67 which suggests that it could grow by 68.66%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than P2 Solar, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than P2 Solar.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTOSP2 Solar0 0 0 INTTinTest3 0 0 -
Is PTOS or INTT More Risky?
P2 Solar has a beta of 11.574, which suggesting that the stock is 1057.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.905, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.531%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTOS or INTT?
P2 Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. P2 Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTOS or INTT?
P2 Solar quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $36.6M. P2 Solar's net income of -$78.5K is lower than inTest's net income of $1.5M. Notably, P2 Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 32.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P2 Solar is 35.10x versus 0.70x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTOSP2 Solar35.10x -- $3.7K -$78.5K INTTinTest0.70x 32.65x $36.6M $1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTOS or SYTA?
Siyata Mobile has a net margin of -2121.94% compared to P2 Solar's net margin of -10.68%. P2 Solar's return on equity of -- beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -252.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTOSP2 Solar43.33% -- -$541K SYTASiyata Mobile29.04% -$0.22 $13.4M -
What do Analysts Say About PTOS or SYTA?
P2 Solar has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58030.41%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than P2 Solar, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than P2 Solar.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTOSP2 Solar0 0 0 SYTASiyata Mobile0 1 0 -
Is PTOS or SYTA More Risky?
P2 Solar has a beta of 11.574, which suggesting that the stock is 1057.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.977%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTOS or SYTA?
P2 Solar has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. P2 Solar pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTOS or SYTA?
P2 Solar quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $5.9M. P2 Solar's net income of -$78.5K is higher than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$626.3K. Notably, P2 Solar's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P2 Solar is 35.10x versus 0.13x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTOSP2 Solar35.10x -- $3.7K -$78.5K SYTASiyata Mobile0.13x -- $5.9M -$626.3K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is CyberArk Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
CyberArk Software (NASDAQ:CYBR), the identity security and management firm, has…
Is Amazon Stock Still Worth Staking On?
Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ: AMZN) posted one of its strongest years…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
RGC alert for Mar 22
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 27.82% over the past day.
Sell
36
VMI alert for Mar 22
Valmont Industries [VMI] is down 12.54% over the past day.
Buy
61
ALNY alert for Mar 22
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals [ALNY] is up 11.7% over the past day.
