QWTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DevvStream has a net margin of -- compared to Quest Water Global's net margin of --. Quest Water Global's return on equity of -- beat DevvStream's return on equity of --.

Quest Water Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DevvStream has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quest Water Global has higher upside potential than DevvStream, analysts believe Quest Water Global is more attractive than DevvStream.

Quest Water Global has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quest Water Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DevvStream offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quest Water Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DevvStream pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quest Water Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DevvStream quarterly revenues of --. Quest Water Global's net income of -$137.3K is higher than DevvStream's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Quest Water Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DevvStream's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Water Global is -- versus -- for DevvStream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GFL Environmental has a net margin of -- compared to Quest Water Global's net margin of 5.48%. Quest Water Global's return on equity of -- beat GFL Environmental's return on equity of -8.01%.

Quest Water Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GFL Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $49.90 which suggests that it could grow by 13.37%. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Quest Water Global.

Quest Water Global has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quest Water Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GFL Environmental offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Quest Water Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 55.07% of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quest Water Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GFL Environmental quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Quest Water Global's net income of -$137.3K is lower than GFL Environmental's net income of $80.9M. Notably, Quest Water Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GFL Environmental's PE ratio is 977.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Water Global is -- versus 2.91x for GFL Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rainmaker Worldwide has a net margin of -- compared to Quest Water Global's net margin of --. Quest Water Global's return on equity of -- beat Rainmaker Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Quest Water Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rainmaker Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quest Water Global has higher upside potential than Rainmaker Worldwide, analysts believe Quest Water Global is more attractive than Rainmaker Worldwide.

Quest Water Global has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rainmaker Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quest Water Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rainmaker Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quest Water Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rainmaker Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quest Water Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rainmaker Worldwide quarterly revenues of --. Quest Water Global's net income of -$137.3K is higher than Rainmaker Worldwide's net income of --. Notably, Quest Water Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rainmaker Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Water Global is -- versus -- for Rainmaker Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Management has a net margin of -- compared to Quest Water Global's net margin of 13.55%. Quest Water Global's return on equity of -- beat Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31%.

Quest Water Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Waste Management has an analysts' consensus of $231.85 which suggests that it could grow by 14.91%. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Quest Water Global.

Quest Water Global has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.869%.

Quest Water Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Management offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Quest Water Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management pays out 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quest Water Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Waste Management quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Quest Water Global's net income of -$137.3K is lower than Waste Management's net income of $760M. Notably, Quest Water Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Waste Management's PE ratio is 30.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Water Global is -- versus 3.81x for Waste Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.