SPTJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PetroChina has a net margin of 0.03% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of 6.25%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of -2.58% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than PetroChina.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.658% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.825%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina offers a yield of 8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays -10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 60.33% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $98.1B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of $925.6K is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.1B. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PetroChina's PE ratio is 6.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.13x versus 0.35x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Recon Technology has a net margin of 0.03% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of -2.58% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than Recon Technology.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.658% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 2.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.021%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays -10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of $925.6K is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.13x versus 2.01x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a net margin of 0.03% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of 1.02%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of -2.58% beat China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.658% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.573%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Petroleum & Chemical offers a yield of 8.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays -10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues of $110.4B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of $925.6K is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Petroleum & Chemical's PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.13x versus 0.16x for China Petroleum & Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of 0.03% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net margin of 1.24%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's return on equity of -2.58% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.658% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.77%.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical pays -10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's net income of $925.6K is lower than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 10.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical is 0.13x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.