XIACY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

9F has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of --. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12033.89%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.449, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.118%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.49x while 9F's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 2.34x versus 0.43x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -56.06%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -27.92%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.89 which suggests that it could fall by -27.97%. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $263.4M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$147.6M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.49x while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 2.34x versus 2.28x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of 14.98%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat VNET Group's return on equity of -33.59%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58.07%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of -0.192, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.173%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $296.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than VNET Group's net income of $44.4M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.49x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 2.34x versus 0.79x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of 36.52%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.59%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Full Truck Alliance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Full Truck Alliance offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues of $423.4M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Full Truck Alliance's net income of $154.6M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.49x while Full Truck Alliance's PE ratio is 29.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 2.34x versus 8.12x for Full Truck Alliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.