XIACY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

9F has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of --. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12808.39%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.467, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.317%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.39x while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.70x versus 0.41x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -8.82%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $16.86 which suggests that it could grow by 20.72%. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $310.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.39x while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.70x versus 3.14x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -0.49%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could grow by 78.57%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.116%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.39x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.70x versus 1.95x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of 17.59%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.41%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Full Truck Alliance has an analysts' consensus of $16.53 which suggests that it could grow by 28.12%. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Full Truck Alliance offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues of $441.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Full Truck Alliance's net income of $77.6M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.39x while Full Truck Alliance's PE ratio is 30.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.70x versus 8.61x for Full Truck Alliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.