ADBE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Adobe's net margin of 17.09%. Adobe's return on equity of 46.85% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $491.35, signalling upside risk potential of 39.6%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $369.17 which suggests that it could grow by 47.38%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Adobe, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Adobe.

Adobe has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.885%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Adobe's net income of $1.8B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.18x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 39.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.11x versus 6.43x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Docusign has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Adobe's net margin of 10.76%. Adobe's return on equity of 46.85% beat Docusign's return on equity of 64.96%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $491.35, signalling upside risk potential of 39.6%. On the other hand Docusign has an analysts' consensus of $92.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.58%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Docusign, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Docusign.

Adobe has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Docusign has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.214%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Docusign offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Docusign pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Docusign quarterly revenues of $776.3M. Adobe's net income of $1.8B is higher than Docusign's net income of $83.5M. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.18x while Docusign's PE ratio is 15.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.11x versus 5.50x for Docusign. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Adobe's net margin of 34.62%. Adobe's return on equity of 46.85% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $491.35, signalling upside risk potential of 39.6%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $493.34 which suggests that it could grow by 31.77%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Microsoft.

Adobe has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Adobe's net income of $1.8B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.18x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 30.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.11x versus 10.68x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Adobe's net margin of 20.78%. Adobe's return on equity of 46.85% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $491.35, signalling upside risk potential of 39.6%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $180.47 which suggests that it could grow by 37.34%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Oracle.

Adobe has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.513%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Adobe's net income of $1.8B is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.18x while Oracle's PE ratio is 30.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.11x versus 6.73x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.