ADBE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 30.02% compared to Adobe's net margin of 16.17%. Adobe's return on equity of 36.84% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.11%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $586.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.05%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $394.98 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Salesforce, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Salesforce.

Adobe has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.388%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.06x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 56.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 9.35x versus 9.02x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 30.02% compared to Adobe's net margin of 37.61%. Adobe's return on equity of 36.84% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $586.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.05%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.24%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Microsoft.

Adobe has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.06x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 9.35x versus 12.83x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 30.02% compared to Adobe's net margin of 22.41%. Adobe's return on equity of 36.84% beat Oracle's return on equity of 128.3%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $586.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.05%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $196.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.85%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Oracle.

Adobe has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.915%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.06x while Oracle's PE ratio is 41.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 9.35x versus 8.78x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 30.02% compared to Adobe's net margin of 23.35%. Adobe's return on equity of 36.84% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 33.34%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $586.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.05%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $90.05 which suggests that it could grow by 48.29%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Adobe, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Adobe.

Adobe has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.034%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.2B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.06x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 30.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 9.35x versus 3.08x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.