AES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duke Energy has a net margin of 18.91% compared to The AES's net margin of 16.37%. The AES's return on equity of 24.24% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 8.94%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $15.02, signalling upside risk potential of 21.98%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $123.21 which suggests that it could grow by 2.57%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than Duke Energy, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than Duke Energy.

The AES has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.095%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.63%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. The AES pays 28.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The AES quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $7.4B. The AES's net income of $560M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.19x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 21.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.71x versus 3.05x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entergy has a net margin of 18.91% compared to The AES's net margin of 10.47%. The AES's return on equity of 24.24% beat Entergy's return on equity of 7.14%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $15.02, signalling upside risk potential of 21.98%. On the other hand Entergy has an analysts' consensus of $87.53 which suggests that it could grow by 2.99%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than Entergy, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than Entergy.

The AES has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entergy has a beta of 0.681, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.863%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.63%. Entergy offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. The AES pays 28.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Entergy pays out 94.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The AES quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Entergy quarterly revenues of $2.7B. The AES's net income of $560M is higher than Entergy's net income of $287.2M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.19x while Entergy's PE ratio is 34.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.71x versus 3.09x for Entergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy has a net margin of 18.91% compared to The AES's net margin of 9.43%. The AES's return on equity of 24.24% beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $15.02, signalling upside risk potential of 21.98%. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $112.74 which suggests that it could grow by 18.19%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than NRG Energy.

The AES has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.279%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.63%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. The AES pays 28.77% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The AES quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $6.8B. The AES's net income of $560M is lower than NRG Energy's net income of $643M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.19x while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 19.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.71x versus 0.72x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 18.91% compared to The AES's net margin of 10.92%. The AES's return on equity of 24.24% beat Vistra's return on equity of 38.93%.

The AES has a consensus price target of $15.02, signalling upside risk potential of 21.98%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $172.70 which suggests that it could grow by 38.76%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than The AES, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than The AES.

The AES has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.355%.

The AES has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.63%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. The AES pays 28.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The AES quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $4B. The AES's net income of $560M is higher than Vistra's net income of $441M. Notably, The AES's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.19x while Vistra's PE ratio is 17.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The AES is 0.71x versus 2.53x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.