BEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hamilton Lane has a net margin of -3.83% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 36.66%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 3.25% beat Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.32, signalling downside risk potential of -0.82%. On the other hand Hamilton Lane has an analysts' consensus of $183.33 which suggests that it could grow by 21.61%. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.501% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.098%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. Hamilton Lane offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane pays out 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues of $150M. Franklin Resources's net income of -$84.7M is lower than Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.83x while Hamilton Lane's PE ratio is 32.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.23x versus 12.55x for Hamilton Lane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazard has a net margin of -3.83% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 13.62%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 3.25% beat Lazard's return on equity of 43.33%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.32, signalling downside risk potential of -0.82%. On the other hand Lazard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.62%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.501% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.566%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. Lazard offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard pays out -229.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Lazard quarterly revenues of $792.4M. Franklin Resources's net income of -$84.7M is lower than Lazard's net income of $107.9M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.83x while Lazard's PE ratio is 20.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.23x versus 1.66x for Lazard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Raymond James Financial has a net margin of -3.83% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 17.64%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 3.25% beat Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.32, signalling downside risk potential of -0.82%. On the other hand Raymond James Financial has an analysts' consensus of $155.14 which suggests that it could grow by 0.06%. Given that Raymond James Financial has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Raymond James Financial is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.501% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.25299999999999%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. Raymond James Financial offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Raymond James Financial pays out 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Raymond James Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Franklin Resources's net income of -$84.7M is lower than Raymond James Financial's net income of $602M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.83x while Raymond James Financial's PE ratio is 15.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.23x versus 2.61x for Raymond James Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of -3.83% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 28.82%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 3.25% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.32, signalling downside risk potential of -0.82%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $80.80 which suggests that it could fall by -2.36%. Given that SEI Investments has more downside risk than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Franklin Resources is more attractive than SEI Investments.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.501% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Franklin Resources's net income of -$84.7M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.83x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 19.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.23x versus 5.32x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.