EW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nutriband has a net margin of 26.43% compared to Edwards Lifesciences's net margin of -211%. Edwards Lifesciences's return on equity of 55.09% beat Nutriband's return on equity of -69.58%.

Edwards Lifesciences has a consensus price target of $79.30, signalling upside risk potential of 6%. On the other hand Nutriband has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 344.44%. Given that Nutriband has higher upside potential than Edwards Lifesciences, analysts believe Nutriband is more attractive than Edwards Lifesciences.

Edwards Lifesciences has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nutriband has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.193%.

Edwards Lifesciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nutriband offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Edwards Lifesciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutriband pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Edwards Lifesciences quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Nutriband quarterly revenues of $645.8K. Edwards Lifesciences's net income of $3.1B is higher than Nutriband's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Edwards Lifesciences's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.80x while Nutriband's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edwards Lifesciences is 6.84x versus 19.85x for Nutriband. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

enVVeno Medical has a net margin of 26.43% compared to Edwards Lifesciences's net margin of --. Edwards Lifesciences's return on equity of 55.09% beat enVVeno Medical's return on equity of --.

Edwards Lifesciences has a consensus price target of $79.30, signalling upside risk potential of 6%. On the other hand enVVeno Medical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 619.71%. Given that enVVeno Medical has higher upside potential than Edwards Lifesciences, analysts believe enVVeno Medical is more attractive than Edwards Lifesciences.

Edwards Lifesciences has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison enVVeno Medical has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.904%.

Edwards Lifesciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. enVVeno Medical offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Edwards Lifesciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. enVVeno Medical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Edwards Lifesciences quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than enVVeno Medical quarterly revenues of --. Edwards Lifesciences's net income of $3.1B is higher than enVVeno Medical's net income of -$5.6M. Notably, Edwards Lifesciences's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.80x while enVVeno Medical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edwards Lifesciences is 6.84x versus 213.30x for enVVeno Medical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SINTX Technologies has a net margin of 26.43% compared to Edwards Lifesciences's net margin of -1700%. Edwards Lifesciences's return on equity of 55.09% beat SINTX Technologies's return on equity of -132.95%.

Edwards Lifesciences has a consensus price target of $79.30, signalling upside risk potential of 6%. On the other hand SINTX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1888.64%. Given that SINTX Technologies has higher upside potential than Edwards Lifesciences, analysts believe SINTX Technologies is more attractive than Edwards Lifesciences.

Edwards Lifesciences has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SINTX Technologies has a beta of 1.497, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.673%.

Edwards Lifesciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SINTX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Edwards Lifesciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SINTX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Edwards Lifesciences quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than SINTX Technologies quarterly revenues of $367K. Edwards Lifesciences's net income of $3.1B is higher than SINTX Technologies's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, Edwards Lifesciences's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.80x while SINTX Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edwards Lifesciences is 6.84x versus 0.96x for SINTX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Beyond Air has a net margin of 26.43% compared to Edwards Lifesciences's net margin of -1673.94%. Edwards Lifesciences's return on equity of 55.09% beat Beyond Air's return on equity of -219.34%.

Edwards Lifesciences has a consensus price target of $79.30, signalling upside risk potential of 6%. On the other hand Beyond Air has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 510.5%. Given that Beyond Air has higher upside potential than Edwards Lifesciences, analysts believe Beyond Air is more attractive than Edwards Lifesciences.

Edwards Lifesciences has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beyond Air has a beta of -0.225, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.529%.

Edwards Lifesciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Beyond Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Edwards Lifesciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beyond Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Edwards Lifesciences quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Beyond Air quarterly revenues of $798K. Edwards Lifesciences's net income of $3.1B is higher than Beyond Air's net income of -$13.4M. Notably, Edwards Lifesciences's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.80x while Beyond Air's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Edwards Lifesciences is 6.84x versus 7.10x for Beyond Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.