FRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 20.08% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 6.22%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 9.09% beat Host Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 10.4%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $125.63, signalling upside risk potential of 12.25%. On the other hand Host Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $20.47 which suggests that it could grow by 12.49%. Given that Host Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than Federal Realty Investment Trust, analysts believe Host Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.457% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.067%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Host Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays 151.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 73.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Federal Realty Investment Trust's is not.

Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are smaller than Host Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $61M is lower than Host Hotels & Resorts's net income of $82M. Notably, Federal Realty Investment Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Host Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Realty Investment Trust is 7.85x versus 2.30x for Host Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of 20.08% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 49.39%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 9.09% beat Prologis's return on equity of 5.33%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $125.63, signalling upside risk potential of 12.25%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $130.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.15%. Given that Prologis has higher upside potential than Federal Realty Investment Trust, analysts believe Prologis is more attractive than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.457% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.27%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays 151.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 105.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2B. Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $61M is lower than Prologis's net income of $1B. Notably, Federal Realty Investment Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Prologis's PE ratio is 31.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Realty Investment Trust is 7.85x versus 12.48x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 20.08% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 28.17%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 9.09% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.68%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $125.63, signalling upside risk potential of 12.25%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $72.94 which suggests that it could grow by 7.12%. Given that Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more attractive than Regency Centers.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.457% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.13%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays 151.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $360.3M. Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $61M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $101.5M. Notably, Federal Realty Investment Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 34.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Realty Investment Trust is 7.85x versus 9.41x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simon Property Group has a net margin of 20.08% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 32.15%. Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 9.09% beat Simon Property Group's return on equity of 68.2%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $125.63, signalling upside risk potential of 12.25%. On the other hand Simon Property Group has an analysts' consensus of $161.44 which suggests that it could grow by 7.63%. Given that Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, analysts believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more attractive than Simon Property Group.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.457% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.069%.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Simon Property Group offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays 151.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Simon Property Group pays out 106.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are smaller than Simon Property Group quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $61M is lower than Simon Property Group's net income of $476M. Notably, Federal Realty Investment Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Simon Property Group's PE ratio is 22.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Realty Investment Trust is 7.85x versus 9.47x for Simon Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.