JWN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boot Barn Holdings has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Nordstrom's net margin of 12.34%. Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.89% beat Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.48%.

Nordstrom has a consensus price target of $24.08, signalling downside risk potential of -0.48%. On the other hand Boot Barn Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $189.08 which suggests that it could grow by 85.72%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.609, which suggesting that the stock is 160.85% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 2.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.835%.

Nordstrom has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Boot Barn Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nordstrom pays 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Boot Barn Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nordstrom quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues of $608.2M. Nordstrom's net income of $165M is higher than Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $75.1M. Notably, Nordstrom's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Boot Barn Holdings's PE ratio is 18.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordstrom is 0.27x versus 1.70x for Boot Barn Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macy's has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Nordstrom's net margin of 4.27%. Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.89% beat Macy's's return on equity of 13.65%.

Nordstrom has a consensus price target of $24.08, signalling downside risk potential of -0.48%. On the other hand Macy's has an analysts' consensus of $15.27 which suggests that it could grow by 16.76%. Given that Macy's has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Macy's is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.609, which suggesting that the stock is 160.85% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macy's has a beta of 2.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.641%.

Nordstrom has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Macy's offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Nordstrom pays 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Macy's pays out 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nordstrom quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Macy's quarterly revenues of $8B. Nordstrom's net income of $165M is lower than Macy's's net income of $342M. Notably, Nordstrom's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Macy's's PE ratio is 6.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordstrom is 0.27x versus 0.16x for Macy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Nordstrom's net margin of 9.93%. Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.89% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 40.64%.

Nordstrom has a consensus price target of $24.08, signalling downside risk potential of -0.48%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $157.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.41%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.609, which suggesting that the stock is 160.85% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.149, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.905%.

Nordstrom has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Nordstrom pays 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nordstrom quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Nordstrom's net income of $165M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $586.8M. Notably, Nordstrom's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordstrom is 0.27x versus 1.95x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Nordstrom's net margin of 7.35%. Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.89% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 17.74%.

Nordstrom has a consensus price target of $24.08, signalling downside risk potential of -0.48%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $59.69 which suggests that it could grow by 22.3%. Given that Urban Outfitters has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Urban Outfitters is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.609, which suggesting that the stock is 160.85% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.560, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.989%.

Nordstrom has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nordstrom pays 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nordstrom quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Nordstrom's net income of $165M is higher than Urban Outfitters's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Nordstrom's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 11.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordstrom is 0.27x versus 0.83x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.