MS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackRock has a net margin of 24.69% compared to Morgan Stanley's net margin of 29.42%. Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08% beat BlackRock's return on equity of 14.59%.

Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $137.33, signalling upside risk potential of 14.59%. On the other hand BlackRock has an analysts' consensus of $1,159.26 which suggests that it could grow by 21.11%. Given that BlackRock has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe BlackRock is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.218% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.789%.

Morgan Stanley has a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. BlackRock offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.21 per share. Morgan Stanley pays 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock pays out 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than BlackRock quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B is higher than BlackRock's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Morgan Stanley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.09x while BlackRock's PE ratio is 22.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Morgan Stanley is 3.35x versus 7.11x for BlackRock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 24.69% compared to Morgan Stanley's net margin of 90.34%. Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 19.66%.

Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $137.33, signalling upside risk potential of 14.59%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $66.43 which suggests that it could grow by 55.2%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.218% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Morgan Stanley has a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Morgan Stanley pays 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $1B. Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B is higher than Robinhood Markets's net income of $916M. Notably, Morgan Stanley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.09x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 27.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Morgan Stanley is 3.35x versus 13.30x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 24.69% compared to Morgan Stanley's net margin of 8.96%. Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93%.

Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $137.33, signalling upside risk potential of 14.59%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $223.30 which suggests that it could grow by 25.34%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.218% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.768%.

Morgan Stanley has a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Morgan Stanley pays 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B is higher than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M. Notably, Morgan Stanley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.09x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 25.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Morgan Stanley is 3.35x versus 2.08x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 24.69% compared to Morgan Stanley's net margin of 34.53%. Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $137.33, signalling upside risk potential of 14.59%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.90 which suggests that it could grow by 14.19%. Given that Morgan Stanley has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Morgan Stanley is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.218% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.615%.

Morgan Stanley has a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Morgan Stanley pays 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues are $15B, which are larger than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B is higher than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Morgan Stanley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.09x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 26.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Morgan Stanley is 3.35x versus 7.36x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.