PCG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Edison International has a net margin of 10.16% compared to PG&E's net margin of 10.24%. PG&E's return on equity of 9.29% beat Edison International's return on equity of 8.38%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $20.49, signalling upside risk potential of 19.54%. On the other hand Edison International has an analysts' consensus of $70.38 which suggests that it could grow by 20.3%. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than PG&E, analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than PG&E.

PG&E has a beta of 1.043, which suggesting that the stock is 4.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edison International has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.155%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Edison International offers a yield of 5.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. PG&E pays 3.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Edison International pays out 83.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Edison International quarterly revenues of $4B. PG&E's net income of $674M is higher than Edison International's net income of $408M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Edison International's PE ratio is 17.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.50x versus 1.29x for Edison International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evergy has a net margin of 10.16% compared to PG&E's net margin of 6.22%. PG&E's return on equity of 9.29% beat Evergy's return on equity of 8.89%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $20.49, signalling upside risk potential of 19.54%. On the other hand Evergy has an analysts' consensus of $69.66 which suggests that it could grow by 2.8%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Evergy, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Evergy.

PG&E has a beta of 1.043, which suggesting that the stock is 4.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evergy has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.933%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Evergy offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. PG&E pays 3.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Evergy pays out 68.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Evergy quarterly revenues of $1.3B. PG&E's net income of $674M is higher than Evergy's net income of $78.2M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Evergy's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.50x versus 2.67x for Evergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPL has a net margin of 10.16% compared to PG&E's net margin of 8.01%. PG&E's return on equity of 9.29% beat PPL's return on equity of 6.32%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $20.49, signalling upside risk potential of 19.54%. On the other hand PPL has an analysts' consensus of $36.38 which suggests that it could grow by 3.44%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than PPL.

PG&E has a beta of 1.043, which suggesting that the stock is 4.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPL has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.749%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. PPL offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. PG&E pays 3.42% of its earnings as a dividend. PPL pays out 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than PPL quarterly revenues of $2.2B. PG&E's net income of $674M is higher than PPL's net income of $177M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while PPL's PE ratio is 28.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.50x versus 3.06x for PPL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 10.16% compared to PG&E's net margin of 10.92%. PG&E's return on equity of 9.29% beat Vistra's return on equity of 38.93%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $20.49, signalling upside risk potential of 19.54%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $172.71 which suggests that it could grow by 33%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than PG&E, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than PG&E.

PG&E has a beta of 1.043, which suggesting that the stock is 4.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.355%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. PG&E pays 3.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $4B. PG&E's net income of $674M is higher than Vistra's net income of $441M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Vistra's PE ratio is 18.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.50x versus 2.64x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.