SNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 3.72%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $323.16, signalling downside risk potential of -3.62%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.88 which suggests that it could grow by 4.07%. Given that Kennametal has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Kennametal is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.694, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.41%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 18.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.81x versus 0.86x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 13.72%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $323.16, signalling downside risk potential of -3.62%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $230.78 which suggests that it could grow by 18.43%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.887%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 23.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.81x versus 2.78x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 2.83%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $323.16, signalling downside risk potential of -3.62%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.76 which suggests that it could grow by 18.42%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.81x versus 1.49x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Middleby has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 11.08%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat The Middleby's return on equity of 12.44%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $323.16, signalling downside risk potential of -3.62%. On the other hand The Middleby has an analysts' consensus of $180.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.56%. Given that The Middleby has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe The Middleby is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Middleby has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.308%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. The Middleby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Middleby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than The Middleby quarterly revenues of $1B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than The Middleby's net income of $112.3M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while The Middleby's PE ratio is 19.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.81x versus 2.20x for The Middleby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.