SWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 4.59%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of -2.29% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.75%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $103.36, signalling upside risk potential of 27%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $27.38 which suggests that it could grow by 14.35%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Kennametal.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.672, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.225%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays -155.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $481.9M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $91.1M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kennametal's PE ratio is 18.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.80x versus 0.93x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of -139.24%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of -2.29% beat Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $103.36, signalling upside risk potential of 27%. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4661.91%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.54%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. Liquidmetal Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays -155.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues of $316K. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $91.1M is higher than Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liquidmetal Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.80x versus 37.88x for Liquidmetal Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 5.72%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of -2.29% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 3.49%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $103.36, signalling upside risk potential of 27%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.61%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.581%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays -155.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $125.6M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $91.1M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 40.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.80x versus 1.93x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 2.43% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of --. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of -2.29% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $103.36, signalling upside risk potential of 27%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6823.61%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.112%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays -155.43% of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $91.1M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.80x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.