VZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 27.51%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.04% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 33.02%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $47.53, signalling upside risk potential of 8.17%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $219.33 which suggests that it could grow by 33.83%. Given that Alphabet has higher upside potential than Verizon Communications, analysts believe Alphabet is more attractive than Verizon Communications.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.408, which suggesting that the stock is 59.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.306%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.11%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Verizon Communications pays 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out 7.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $35.7B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $96.5B. Verizon Communications's net income of $5B is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.5B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 20.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.38x versus 5.93x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 43.07%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.04% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 38.66%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $47.53, signalling upside risk potential of 8.17%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $765.07 which suggests that it could grow by 30.99%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Verizon Communications, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Verizon Communications.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.408, which suggesting that the stock is 59.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.136%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.11%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Verizon Communications pays 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $35.7B, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $48.4B. Verizon Communications's net income of $5B is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $20.8B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 24.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.38x versus 9.27x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 18.24%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.04% beat Netflix's return on equity of 39.06%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $47.53, signalling upside risk potential of 8.17%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,071.74 which suggests that it could grow by 11.7%. Given that Netflix has higher upside potential than Verizon Communications, analysts believe Netflix is more attractive than Verizon Communications.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.408, which suggesting that the stock is 59.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.663%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.11%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verizon Communications pays 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $35.7B, which are larger than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.2B. Verizon Communications's net income of $5B is higher than Netflix's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Netflix's PE ratio is 48.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.38x versus 10.81x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T-Mobile US has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 13.63%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.04% beat T-Mobile US's return on equity of 17.98%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $47.53, signalling upside risk potential of 8.17%. On the other hand T-Mobile US has an analysts' consensus of $255.42 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than T-Mobile US, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than T-Mobile US.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.408, which suggesting that the stock is 59.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T-Mobile US has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.882%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.11%. T-Mobile US offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Verizon Communications pays 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. T-Mobile US pays out 29.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $35.7B, which are larger than T-Mobile US quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Verizon Communications's net income of $5B is higher than T-Mobile US's net income of $3B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while T-Mobile US's PE ratio is 26.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.38x versus 3.74x for T-Mobile US. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.