AEYE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five9 has a net margin of -15.3% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 4.16%. AudioEye's return on equity of -63.94% beat Five9's return on equity of -2.34%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $26.40, signalling upside risk potential of 132.8%. On the other hand Five9 has an analysts' consensus of $56.05 which suggests that it could grow by 90.12%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Five9, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Five9.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five9 has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.13%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than Five9 quarterly revenues of $278.7M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Five9's net income of $11.6M. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 3.83x versus 2.11x for Five9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -15.3% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 34.62%. AudioEye's return on equity of -63.94% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $26.40, signalling upside risk potential of 132.8%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.75 which suggests that it could grow by 30.42%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Microsoft.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 3.83x versus 11.09x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of -15.3% compared to AudioEye's net margin of -3.78%. AudioEye's return on equity of -63.94% beat Ncino's return on equity of -1.7%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $26.40, signalling upside risk potential of 132.8%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $42.07 which suggests that it could grow by 48.45%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Ncino, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Ncino.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than Ncino quarterly revenues of $138.8M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Ncino's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 3.83x versus 6.21x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEMrush Holdings has a net margin of -15.3% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 3.26%. AudioEye's return on equity of -63.94% beat SEMrush Holdings's return on equity of 3.35%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $26.40, signalling upside risk potential of 132.8%. On the other hand SEMrush Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $17.57 which suggests that it could grow by 81.15%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than SEMrush Holdings, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than SEMrush Holdings.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.748% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEMrush Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SEMrush Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SEMrush Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than SEMrush Holdings quarterly revenues of $102.6M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M is lower than SEMrush Holdings's net income of $3.3M. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SEMrush Holdings's PE ratio is 194.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 3.83x versus 3.83x for SEMrush Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.