APPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five9 has a net margin of -8.19% compared to Appian's net margin of 4.16%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Five9's return on equity of -2.34%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $40.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.62%. On the other hand Five9 has an analysts' consensus of $56.05 which suggests that it could grow by 85.96%. Given that Five9 has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Five9 is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.651, which suggesting that the stock is 65.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five9 has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.13%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Five9 quarterly revenues of $278.7M. Appian's net income of -$13.6M is lower than Five9's net income of $11.6M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.64x versus 2.16x for Five9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jamf Holding has a net margin of -8.19% compared to Appian's net margin of -10.08%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.61%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $40.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.62%. On the other hand Jamf Holding has an analysts' consensus of $19.80 which suggests that it could grow by 50.34%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.651, which suggesting that the stock is 65.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jamf Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jamf Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are larger than Jamf Holding quarterly revenues of $163M. Appian's net income of -$13.6M is higher than Jamf Holding's net income of -$16.4M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jamf Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.64x versus 2.69x for Jamf Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -8.19% compared to Appian's net margin of 34.62%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $40.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.62%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.24 which suggests that it could grow by 29.39%. Given that Appian has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Appian is more attractive than Microsoft.

Appian has a beta of 1.651, which suggesting that the stock is 65.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Appian's net income of -$13.6M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.64x versus 11.17x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasystems has a net margin of -8.19% compared to Appian's net margin of 24.26%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 22.16%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $40.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.62%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $105.36 which suggests that it could grow by 44.55%. Given that Pegasystems has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Pegasystems is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.651, which suggesting that the stock is 65.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.778%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $490.8M. Appian's net income of -$13.6M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 72.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.64x versus 4.40x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.