AQMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of -- compared to Aqua Metals's net margin of 3.86%. Aqua Metals's return on equity of -- beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Aqua Metals has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 101.34%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.4%. Given that Aqua Metals has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Aqua Metals is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 27.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.4%.

Aqua Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aqua Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aqua Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Aqua Metals's net income of -$5.2M is lower than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Aqua Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 13.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aqua Metals is -- versus 0.53x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Aqua Metals's net margin of 15.74%. Aqua Metals's return on equity of -- beat Mueller Industries's return on equity of 23.6%.

Aqua Metals has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 101.34%. On the other hand Mueller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $105.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.93%. Given that Aqua Metals has higher upside potential than Mueller Industries, analysts believe Aqua Metals is more attractive than Mueller Industries.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 27.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Industries has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.588%.

Aqua Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Industries offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Aqua Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries pays out 14.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aqua Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mueller Industries quarterly revenues of $1B. Aqua Metals's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Mueller Industries's net income of $157.4M. Notably, Aqua Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mueller Industries's PE ratio is 13.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aqua Metals is -- versus 2.15x for Mueller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -- compared to Aqua Metals's net margin of -697.46%. Aqua Metals's return on equity of -- beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

Aqua Metals has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 101.34%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.15 which suggests that it could grow by 153.36%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Aqua Metals, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Aqua Metals.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 27.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.009%.

Aqua Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aqua Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aqua Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Aqua Metals's net income of -$5.2M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Aqua Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aqua Metals is -- versus 1.06x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of -- compared to Aqua Metals's net margin of 1.44%. Aqua Metals's return on equity of -- beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9%.

Aqua Metals has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 101.34%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $13.83 which suggests that it could grow by 44.1%. Given that Aqua Metals has higher upside potential than Smith & Wesson Brands, analysts believe Aqua Metals is more attractive than Smith & Wesson Brands.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 27.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.267%.

Aqua Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Aqua Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aqua Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $115.9M. Aqua Metals's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Aqua Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 14.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aqua Metals is -- versus 0.88x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.