MLI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carpenter Technology has a net margin of 14.91% compared to Mueller Industries's net margin of 12.42%. Mueller Industries's return on equity of 23.46% beat Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84%.

Mueller Industries has a consensus price target of $105.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.66%. On the other hand Carpenter Technology has an analysts' consensus of $247.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.55%. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than Mueller Industries, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than Mueller Industries.

Mueller Industries has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.588% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.466%.

Mueller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Carpenter Technology offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Mueller Industries pays 14.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology pays out 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mueller Industries quarterly revenues are $923.5M, which are larger than Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues of $676.9M. Mueller Industries's net income of $137.7M is higher than Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M. Notably, Mueller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.96x while Carpenter Technology's PE ratio is 32.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mueller Industries is 2.24x versus 3.01x for Carpenter Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 14.91% compared to Mueller Industries's net margin of -20.76%. Mueller Industries's return on equity of 23.46% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Mueller Industries has a consensus price target of $105.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.66%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mueller Industries has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Mueller Industries is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Mueller Industries has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.588% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.163, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.682%.

Mueller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Mueller Industries pays 14.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mueller Industries quarterly revenues are $923.5M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Mueller Industries's net income of $137.7M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Mueller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.96x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mueller Industries is 2.24x versus 0.35x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 14.91% compared to Mueller Industries's net margin of 3.86%. Mueller Industries's return on equity of 23.46% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Mueller Industries has a consensus price target of $105.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.66%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.12%. Given that Mueller Industries has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Mueller Industries is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Mueller Industries has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.588% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.4%.

Mueller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mueller Industries pays 14.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mueller Industries quarterly revenues are $923.5M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Mueller Industries's net income of $137.7M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Mueller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.96x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 14.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mueller Industries is 2.24x versus 0.55x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 14.91% compared to Mueller Industries's net margin of -82.25%. Mueller Industries's return on equity of 23.46% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Mueller Industries has a consensus price target of $105.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.66%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22340370.22%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Mueller Industries, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Mueller Industries.

Mueller Industries has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.588% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.746, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 274.628%.

Mueller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mueller Industries pays 14.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mueller Industries quarterly revenues are $923.5M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Mueller Industries's net income of $137.7M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Mueller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.96x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mueller Industries is 2.24x versus 0.01x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.