AYRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -6235.97% compared to AYRO's net margin of -863177.78%. AYRO's return on equity of -23.87% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -159.67%.

AYRO has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 252.11%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8262229.77%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than AYRO, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than AYRO.

AYRO has a beta of 3.265, which suggesting that the stock is 226.536% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AYRO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AYRO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AYRO quarterly revenues are $5.4K, which are smaller than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of $9K. AYRO's net income of $550.6K is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -$77.7M. Notably, AYRO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AYRO is 14.79x versus 14.64x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canoo has a net margin of -6235.97% compared to AYRO's net margin of -819.84%. AYRO's return on equity of -23.87% beat Canoo's return on equity of -69.19%.

AYRO has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 252.11%. On the other hand Canoo has an analysts' consensus of $12.86 which suggests that it could grow by 3804.43%. Given that Canoo has higher upside potential than AYRO, analysts believe Canoo is more attractive than AYRO.

AYRO has a beta of 3.265, which suggesting that the stock is 226.536% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canoo has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.492%.

AYRO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AYRO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AYRO quarterly revenues are $5.4K, which are smaller than Canoo quarterly revenues of $891K. AYRO's net income of $550.6K is lower than Canoo's net income of $3.3M. Notably, AYRO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canoo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AYRO is 14.79x versus -- for Canoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -6235.97% compared to AYRO's net margin of -496.14%. AYRO's return on equity of -23.87% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

AYRO has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 252.11%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.27 which suggests that it could fall by -6.22%. Given that AYRO has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe AYRO is more attractive than Lucid Group.

AYRO has a beta of 3.265, which suggesting that the stock is 226.536% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AYRO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AYRO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AYRO quarterly revenues are $5.4K, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. AYRO's net income of $550.6K is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, AYRO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AYRO is 14.79x versus 9.51x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -6235.97% compared to AYRO's net margin of -1001.53%. AYRO's return on equity of -23.87% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

AYRO has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 252.11%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.83 which suggests that it could grow by 40.03%. Given that AYRO has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe AYRO is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

AYRO has a beta of 3.265, which suggesting that the stock is 226.536% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.766%.

AYRO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AYRO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AYRO quarterly revenues are $5.4K, which are smaller than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. AYRO's net income of $550.6K is higher than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, AYRO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AYRO is 14.79x versus 1.60x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.