WKHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crocs has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of 37.27%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Crocs's return on equity of 57.48%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 512.75%. On the other hand Crocs has an analysts' consensus of $129.26 which suggests that it could grow by 24.44%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Crocs.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.788, which suggesting that the stock is 178.753% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs has a beta of 1.837, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.697%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crocs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Crocs quarterly revenues of $989.8M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is lower than Crocs's net income of $368.9M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crocs's PE ratio is 6.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.33x versus 1.52x for Crocs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Industries has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -10.7%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Forward Industries's return on equity of -107.49%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 512.75%. On the other hand Forward Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Forward Industries, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Forward Industries.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.788, which suggesting that the stock is 178.753% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Industries has a beta of 0.436, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.399%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Forward Industries quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is lower than Forward Industries's net income of -$708.1K. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forward Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.33x versus 0.13x for Forward Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fossil Group has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -2.21%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat Fossil Group's return on equity of -53.25%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 512.75%. On the other hand Fossil Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.61%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Fossil Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.788, which suggesting that the stock is 178.753% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fossil Group has a beta of 2.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.74%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fossil Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fossil Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Fossil Group quarterly revenues of $342.3M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is lower than Fossil Group's net income of -$7.6M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fossil Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.33x versus 0.07x for Fossil Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

G-III Apparel Group has a net margin of -1001.53% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of 5.81%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46% beat G-III Apparel Group's return on equity of 12.24%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 512.75%. On the other hand G-III Apparel Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.75 which suggests that it could grow by 17.33%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than G-III Apparel Group, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than G-III Apparel Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.788, which suggesting that the stock is 178.753% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-III Apparel Group has a beta of 2.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.524%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G-III Apparel Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. G-III Apparel Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than G-III Apparel Group quarterly revenues of $839.5M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M is lower than G-III Apparel Group's net income of $48.8M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while G-III Apparel Group's PE ratio is 6.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.33x versus 0.39x for G-III Apparel Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.