BHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Life has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of -18.21%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86% beat Abacus Life's return on equity of -5.9%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 8.79%. On the other hand Abacus Life has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 86.45%. Given that Abacus Life has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Abacus Life is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Life offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Life pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Abacus Life quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M is higher than Abacus Life's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Abacus Life's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 5.12x for Abacus Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 4.52%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86% beat Citizens's return on equity of 11.99%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 8.79%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.090, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.012%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M is higher than Citizens's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Citizens's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.82x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 4.61%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 0.98%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 8.79%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.69%. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.036%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M is higher than Genworth Financial's net income of $85M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 35.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.43x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 21.23%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86% beat Primerica's return on equity of 21.41%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 8.79%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $309.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.94%. Given that Primerica has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Primerica is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.951%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $774.1M. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M is higher than Primerica's net income of $164.4M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Primerica's PE ratio is 20.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 3.04x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.