GNW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Life has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Genworth Financial's net margin of -18.21%. Genworth Financial's return on equity of 0.98% beat Abacus Life's return on equity of -5.9%.

Genworth Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.45%. On the other hand Abacus Life has an analysts' consensus of $14.38 which suggests that it could grow by 84.3%. Given that Abacus Life has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Abacus Life is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Genworth Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Life offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Life pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Abacus Life quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Genworth Financial's net income of $85M is higher than Abacus Life's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Genworth Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.90x while Abacus Life's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial is 0.43x versus 5.18x for Abacus Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Genworth Financial's net margin of 8.97%. Genworth Financial's return on equity of 0.98% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86%.

Genworth Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.45%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.798%.

Genworth Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Genworth Financial's net income of $85M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M. Notably, Genworth Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.90x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial is 0.43x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Genworth Financial's net margin of 4.52%. Genworth Financial's return on equity of 0.98% beat Citizens's return on equity of 11.99%.

Genworth Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.45%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.55%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.090, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.012%.

Genworth Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Genworth Financial's net income of $85M is higher than Citizens's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Genworth Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.90x while Citizens's PE ratio is 8.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial is 0.43x versus 0.78x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Genworth Financial's net margin of -12.58%. Genworth Financial's return on equity of 0.98% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12%.

Genworth Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.45%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $36.09 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.395%.

Genworth Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Genworth Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Genworth Financial's net income of $85M is higher than Lincoln National's net income of -$528M. Notably, Genworth Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.90x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 22.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial is 0.43x versus 0.40x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.