NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
38
BULD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.82
Seasonality move
:
7.73%
Day range:
$21.73 - $21.73
52-week range:
$19.60 - $24.52
Dividend yield:
0.16%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
156
Avg. volume:
286
1-year change:
1.3%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITEQ
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
$21.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.16% | -- |
|
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
|
$74.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.18% | -- |
|
ITEQ
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
|
$51.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
$34.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 1.43% | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
$29.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
$44.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.18% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | 1.970 | -- | -- |
|
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | 0.636 | -- | -- |
|
ITEQ
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
|
-- | 1.617 | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.089 | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | 1.785 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITEQ
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BULD or HACK?
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net margin of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Cybersecurity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULD or HACK?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Cybersecurity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Cybersecurity ETF, analysts believe Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is more attractive than Amplify Cybersecurity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF0 0 0 HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF0 0 0 -
Is BULD or HACK More Risky?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Cybersecurity ETF has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.408%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULD or HACK?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.16%. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULD or HACK?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Cybersecurity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Cybersecurity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Cybersecurity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- -- HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BULD or ITEQ?
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net margin of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- ITEQAmplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULD or ITEQ?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF, analysts believe Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is more attractive than Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF0 0 0 ITEQAmplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is BULD or ITEQ More Risky?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.063%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULD or ITEQ?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.16%. Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULD or ITEQ?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- -- ITEQAmplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BULD or PSWD?
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net margin of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULD or PSWD?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF, analysts believe Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF0 0 0 PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is BULD or PSWD More Risky?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULD or PSWD?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.16%. Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULD or PSWD?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- -- PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BULD or SPAM?
Themes Cybersecurity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net margin of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's return on equity of -- beat Themes Cybersecurity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULD or SPAM?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Themes Cybersecurity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has higher upside potential than Themes Cybersecurity ETF, analysts believe Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is more attractive than Themes Cybersecurity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF0 0 0 SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF0 0 0 -
Is BULD or SPAM More Risky?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Themes Cybersecurity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULD or SPAM?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.16%. Themes Cybersecurity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Themes Cybersecurity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULD or SPAM?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Themes Cybersecurity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net income of -- is lower than Themes Cybersecurity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Themes Cybersecurity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is -- versus -- for Themes Cybersecurity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- -- SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BULD or TINY?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net margin of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULD or TINY?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF, analysts believe Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is more attractive than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF0 0 0 TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 -
Is BULD or TINY More Risky?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULD or TINY?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.16%. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULD or TINY?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- -- TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 2.15% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 6.55% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 5.38% over the past day.
