NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
41
TINY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$44.45
Seasonality move
:
6.21%
Day range:
$44.45 - $44.73
52-week range:
$39.35 - $55.98
Dividend yield:
0.18%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
241
Avg. volume:
1.1K
1-year change:
9.75%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITEQ
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
$44.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.18% | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
$21.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.16% | -- |
|
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
|
$74.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.18% | -- |
|
ITEQ
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
|
$51.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
$34.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 1.43% | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
$29.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | 1.785 | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | 1.970 | -- | -- |
|
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | 0.636 | -- | -- |
|
ITEQ
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
|
-- | 1.617 | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.089 | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BULD
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ITEQ
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or BULD?
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or BULD More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or BULD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- BULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or HACK?
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Cybersecurity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or HACK?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Cybersecurity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Cybersecurity ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Amplify Cybersecurity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or HACK More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Cybersecurity ETF has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.408%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or HACK?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or HACK?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Cybersecurity ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Cybersecurity ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Cybersecurity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or ITEQ?
Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- ITEQAmplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or ITEQ?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 ITEQAmplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or ITEQ More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.063%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or ITEQ?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or ITEQ?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- ITEQAmplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or PSWD?
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or PSWD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or PSWD More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or PSWD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or PSWD?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- PSWDXtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TINY or SPAM?
Themes Cybersecurity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Themes Cybersecurity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TINY or SPAM?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Themes Cybersecurity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has higher upside potential than Themes Cybersecurity ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is more attractive than Themes Cybersecurity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF0 0 0 SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF0 0 0 -
Is TINY or SPAM More Risky?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Themes Cybersecurity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TINY or SPAM?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Themes Cybersecurity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Themes Cybersecurity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TINY or SPAM?
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Themes Cybersecurity ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Themes Cybersecurity ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nanotechnology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Themes Cybersecurity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF is -- versus -- for Themes Cybersecurity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TINYProShares Nanotechnology ETF-- -- -- -- SPAMThemes Cybersecurity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.25% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 8.13% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4% over the past day.
