CHCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 40.47% compared to City Holding's net margin of 16.32%. City Holding's return on equity of 17.06% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

City Holding has a consensus price target of $127.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.19%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.17%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than City Holding, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than City Holding.

City Holding has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

City Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. City Holding pays 34.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

City Holding quarterly revenues are $73.7M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. City Holding's net income of $29.8M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, City Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.54x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for City Holding is 6.33x versus 2.89x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First United has a net margin of 40.47% compared to City Holding's net margin of 28.48%. City Holding's return on equity of 17.06% beat First United's return on equity of 9.84%.

City Holding has a consensus price target of $127.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.19%. On the other hand First United has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.51%. Given that City Holding has higher upside potential than First United, analysts believe City Holding is more attractive than First United.

City Holding has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First United has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.767%.

City Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. First United offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. City Holding pays 34.97% of its earnings as a dividend. First United pays out 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

City Holding quarterly revenues are $73.7M, which are larger than First United quarterly revenues of $20.3M. City Holding's net income of $29.8M is higher than First United's net income of $5.8M. Notably, City Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.54x while First United's PE ratio is 13.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for City Holding is 6.33x versus 3.03x for First United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 40.47% compared to City Holding's net margin of 27.77%. City Holding's return on equity of 17.06% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

City Holding has a consensus price target of $127.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.19%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.43%. Given that City Holding has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe City Holding is more attractive than Park National.

City Holding has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

City Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Park National offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. City Holding pays 34.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

City Holding quarterly revenues are $73.7M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. City Holding's net income of $29.8M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, City Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.54x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for City Holding is 6.33x versus 5.72x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regions Financial has a net margin of 40.47% compared to City Holding's net margin of 27.37%. City Holding's return on equity of 17.06% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.1%.

City Holding has a consensus price target of $127.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.19%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $27.90 which suggests that it could grow by 17.02%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than City Holding, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than City Holding.

City Holding has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.583% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.148%.

City Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. City Holding pays 34.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 42.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

City Holding quarterly revenues are $73.7M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. City Holding's net income of $29.8M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $490M. Notably, City Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.54x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 13.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for City Holding is 6.33x versus 3.11x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.