CLAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acushnet Holdings has a net margin of -4.7% compared to Clarus's net margin of 9.06%. Clarus's return on equity of 1.61% beat Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.38%. On the other hand Acushnet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $73.13 which suggests that it could grow by 0.92%. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Clarus has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.156%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Acushnet Holdings offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Clarus pays -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings pays out 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are smaller than Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues of $620.5M. Clarus's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while Acushnet Holdings's PE ratio is 24.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.63x versus 1.92x for Acushnet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors has a net margin of -4.7% compared to Clarus's net margin of -32.37%. Clarus's return on equity of 1.61% beat Johnson Outdoors's return on equity of -5.38%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.38%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.52%. Given that Johnson Outdoors has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe Johnson Outdoors is more attractive than Clarus.

Clarus has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.327%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Johnson Outdoors offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Clarus pays -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors pays out -50.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are smaller than Johnson Outdoors quarterly revenues of $105.9M. Clarus's net income of -$3.2M is higher than Johnson Outdoors's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while Johnson Outdoors's PE ratio is 89.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.63x versus 0.59x for Johnson Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

YETI Holdings has a net margin of -4.7% compared to Clarus's net margin of 11.76%. Clarus's return on equity of 1.61% beat YETI Holdings's return on equity of 28.86%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.38%. On the other hand YETI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $45.81 which suggests that it could grow by 22.4%. Given that YETI Holdings has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe YETI Holdings is more attractive than Clarus.

Clarus has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison YETI Holdings has a beta of 2.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.67%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. YETI Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. YETI Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are smaller than YETI Holdings quarterly revenues of $478.4M. Clarus's net income of -$3.2M is lower than YETI Holdings's net income of $56.3M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while YETI Holdings's PE ratio is 16.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.63x versus 1.79x for YETI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Connexa Sports Technologies has a net margin of -4.7% compared to Clarus's net margin of -377.86%. Clarus's return on equity of 1.61% beat Connexa Sports Technologies's return on equity of -661.78%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.38%. On the other hand Connexa Sports Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Connexa Sports Technologies, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Connexa Sports Technologies.

Clarus has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Connexa Sports Technologies has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.893%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Connexa Sports Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Connexa Sports Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $67.1M, which are larger than Connexa Sports Technologies quarterly revenues of $361.5K. Clarus's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Connexa Sports Technologies's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while Connexa Sports Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.63x versus 0.63x for Connexa Sports Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.