GOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Escalade has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of 8.37%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Escalade's return on equity of 7.96%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Escalade has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.8%. Given that Escalade has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Escalade is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Escalade has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.646%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Escalade offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Escalade pays out 62.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Escalade quarterly revenues of $67.7M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Escalade's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.38x while Escalade's PE ratio is 15.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.86x versus 0.81x for Escalade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -32.37%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Johnson Outdoors's return on equity of -5.38%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.01%. Given that Johnson Outdoors has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Johnson Outdoors is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.158%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Johnson Outdoors offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors pays out -50.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Johnson Outdoors quarterly revenues of $105.9M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Johnson Outdoors's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.38x while Johnson Outdoors's PE ratio is 92.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.86x versus 0.64x for Johnson Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sacks Parente Golf has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -87.53%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Sacks Parente Golf's return on equity of -107.95%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Sacks Parente Golf has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3691.47%. Given that Sacks Parente Golf has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Sacks Parente Golf is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sacks Parente Golf has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Sacks Parente Golf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Sacks Parente Golf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Sacks Parente Golf quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Sacks Parente Golf's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.38x while Sacks Parente Golf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.86x versus 0.19x for Sacks Parente Golf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Connexa Sports Technologies has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -377.86%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Connexa Sports Technologies's return on equity of -661.78%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Connexa Sports Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Acushnet Holdings has higher upside potential than Connexa Sports Technologies, analysts believe Acushnet Holdings is more attractive than Connexa Sports Technologies.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Connexa Sports Technologies has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.283%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Connexa Sports Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Connexa Sports Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Connexa Sports Technologies quarterly revenues of $361.5K. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Connexa Sports Technologies's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.38x while Connexa Sports Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.86x versus 0.50x for Connexa Sports Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.