CTLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Cantaloupe's net margin of --. Cantaloupe's return on equity of 7.51% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

Cantaloupe has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9051.92%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Cantaloupe, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Cantaloupe.

Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cantaloupe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cantaloupe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cantaloupe quarterly revenues are $70.8M, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Cantaloupe's net income of $3.6M is higher than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Cantaloupe's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.00x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cantaloupe is 2.50x versus -- for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Cantaloupe's net margin of --. Cantaloupe's return on equity of 7.51% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Cantaloupe has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -23.38%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Aurora Innovation, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Aurora Innovation.

Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cantaloupe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cantaloupe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cantaloupe quarterly revenues are $70.8M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Cantaloupe's net income of $3.6M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, Cantaloupe's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.00x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cantaloupe is 2.50x versus 160.98x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

N-able has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Cantaloupe's net margin of 9.24%. Cantaloupe's return on equity of 7.51% beat N-able's return on equity of 5.16%.

Cantaloupe has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23%. On the other hand N-able has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.83%. Given that N-able has higher upside potential than Cantaloupe, analysts believe N-able is more attractive than Cantaloupe.

Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison N-able has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cantaloupe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. N-able offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cantaloupe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. N-able pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cantaloupe quarterly revenues are $70.8M, which are smaller than N-able quarterly revenues of $116.4M. Cantaloupe's net income of $3.6M is lower than N-able's net income of $10.8M. Notably, Cantaloupe's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.00x while N-able's PE ratio is 47.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cantaloupe is 2.50x versus 3.91x for N-able. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Cantaloupe's net margin of -65748.98%. Cantaloupe's return on equity of 7.51% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

Cantaloupe has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Veea.

Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cantaloupe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cantaloupe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cantaloupe quarterly revenues are $70.8M, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $50.7K. Cantaloupe's net income of $3.6M is higher than Veea's net income of -$33.3M. Notably, Cantaloupe's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.00x while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cantaloupe is 2.50x versus -- for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.