DUOL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Duolingo's net margin of 18.49%. Duolingo's return on equity of 11.72% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Duolingo has a consensus price target of $385.14, signalling upside risk potential of 22.69%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $335.29 which suggests that it could grow by 30.39%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Duolingo, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Duolingo.

Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.404%.

Duolingo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duolingo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duolingo quarterly revenues are $209.6M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Duolingo's net income of $13.9M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Duolingo's price-to-earnings ratio is 167.01x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 50.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duolingo is 19.82x versus 9.10x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intapp has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Duolingo's net margin of -8.43%. Duolingo's return on equity of 11.72% beat Intapp's return on equity of -5.37%.

Duolingo has a consensus price target of $385.14, signalling upside risk potential of 22.69%. On the other hand Intapp has an analysts' consensus of $77.25 which suggests that it could grow by 41.25%. Given that Intapp has higher upside potential than Duolingo, analysts believe Intapp is more attractive than Duolingo.

Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intapp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Duolingo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intapp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duolingo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intapp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duolingo quarterly revenues are $209.6M, which are larger than Intapp quarterly revenues of $121.2M. Duolingo's net income of $13.9M is higher than Intapp's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Duolingo's price-to-earnings ratio is 167.01x while Intapp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duolingo is 19.82x versus 8.83x for Intapp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Duolingo's net margin of 11.89%. Duolingo's return on equity of 11.72% beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.84%.

Duolingo has a consensus price target of $385.14, signalling upside risk potential of 22.69%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $705.68 which suggests that it could grow by 17.54%. Given that Duolingo has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Duolingo is more attractive than Intuit.

Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.578%.

Duolingo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Duolingo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Duolingo quarterly revenues are $209.6M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $4B. Duolingo's net income of $13.9M is lower than Intuit's net income of $471M. Notably, Duolingo's price-to-earnings ratio is 167.01x while Intuit's PE ratio is 55.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duolingo is 19.82x versus 9.88x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Duolingo's net margin of 4.25%. Duolingo's return on equity of 11.72% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Duolingo has a consensus price target of $385.14, signalling upside risk potential of 22.69%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $311.81 which suggests that it could grow by 36.56%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Duolingo, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Duolingo.

Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.323, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.275%.

Duolingo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duolingo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duolingo quarterly revenues are $209.6M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Duolingo's net income of $13.9M is lower than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Duolingo's price-to-earnings ratio is 167.01x while Workday's PE ratio is 116.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duolingo is 19.82x versus 7.28x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.