GCMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 3.34% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 33.56%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 29.74%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.15%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.328%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 159.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 41.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but GCM Grosvenor's is not.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $124.5M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $43.6M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $4.2M is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 8.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.74x versus 2.84x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 3.34% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 99.99%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.15%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.3%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.493%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 159.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but GCM Grosvenor's is not.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $124.5M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $4.2M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.74x versus 13.52x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 3.34% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 89.54%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.15%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.99%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.614%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 159.08% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $124.5M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $4.2M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.74x versus 7.23x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 3.34% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of -121.48%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.15%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.44%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 159.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $124.5M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $4.2M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.74x versus 21.19x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.