HLIT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BK Technologies has a net margin of 17.16% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 20.4%. Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 34.24%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 37.75%. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.36%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than BK Technologies.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.302%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $222.2M, which are larger than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $17.9M. Harmonic's net income of $38.1M is higher than BK Technologies's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 18.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.45x versus 2.02x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 17.16% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -38.51%. Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -65.2%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 37.75%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 300%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.931%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $222.2M, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.6M. Harmonic's net income of $38.1M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of -$48.7M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.45x versus 0.07x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries has a net margin of 17.16% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -16.01%. Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19% beat KVH Industries's return on equity of -7.7%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 37.75%. On the other hand KVH Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.99%. Given that KVH Industries has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe KVH Industries is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.894%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KVH Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $222.2M, which are larger than KVH Industries quarterly revenues of $26.9M. Harmonic's net income of $38.1M is higher than KVH Industries's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while KVH Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.45x versus 0.84x for KVH Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 17.16% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 3.36%. Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of -5.57%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 37.75%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $12.44 which suggests that it could grow by 26.14%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than Viavi Solutions, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than Viavi Solutions.

Harmonic has a beta of 0.921, which suggesting that the stock is 7.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.274%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $222.2M, which are smaller than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $270.8M. Harmonic's net income of $38.1M is higher than Viavi Solutions's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.45x versus 2.19x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.