BKTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harmonic has a net margin of 11.68% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of 17.16%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.81%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 14.08%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Harmonic.

BK Technologies has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.243%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $222.2M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M is lower than Harmonic's net income of $38.1M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.30x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 31.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.34x versus 1.75x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inseego has a net margin of 11.68% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of -1.18%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52% beat Inseego's return on equity of --.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.81%. On the other hand Inseego has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 48.52%. Given that Inseego has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Inseego is more attractive than BK Technologies.

BK Technologies has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inseego has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.855%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inseego offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inseego pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Inseego quarterly revenues of $48.1M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M is higher than Inseego's net income of -$566K. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.30x while Inseego's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.34x versus 0.56x for Inseego. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries has a net margin of 11.68% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of -16.01%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52% beat KVH Industries's return on equity of -7.7%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.81%. On the other hand KVH Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.19%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than KVH Industries, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than KVH Industries.

BK Technologies has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.243%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KVH Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than KVH Industries quarterly revenues of $26.9M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M is higher than KVH Industries's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.30x while KVH Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.34x versus 0.88x for KVH Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 11.68% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of 3.36%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 22.52% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of -5.57%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.81%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $12.69 which suggests that it could grow by 17.59%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Viavi Solutions, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Viavi Solutions.

BK Technologies has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.733%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $20.2M, which are smaller than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $270.8M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.4M is lower than Viavi Solutions's net income of $9.1M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.30x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.34x versus 2.39x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.