INOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pegasystems has a net margin of 33.3% compared to Innodata's net margin of -4.43%. Innodata's return on equity of 67.04% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 33.73%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $46.75, signalling upside risk potential of 1.13%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $98.60 which suggests that it could grow by 3.14%. Given that Pegasystems has higher upside potential than Innodata, analysts believe Pegasystems is more attractive than Innodata.

Innodata has a beta of 2.558, which suggesting that the stock is 155.788% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.458%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 14.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $325.1M. Innodata's net income of $17.4M is higher than Pegasystems's net income of -$14.4M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.42x while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 68.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 10.42x versus 5.63x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LiveRamp Holdings has a net margin of 33.3% compared to Innodata's net margin of 0.93%. Innodata's return on equity of 67.04% beat LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.3%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $46.75, signalling upside risk potential of 1.13%. On the other hand LiveRamp Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.14 which suggests that it could grow by 19.62%. Given that LiveRamp Holdings has higher upside potential than Innodata, analysts believe LiveRamp Holdings is more attractive than Innodata.

Innodata has a beta of 2.558, which suggesting that the stock is 155.788% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.31%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LiveRamp Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LiveRamp Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues of $185.5M. Innodata's net income of $17.4M is higher than LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.42x while LiveRamp Holdings's PE ratio is 621.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 10.42x versus 2.97x for LiveRamp Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Voyix has a net margin of 33.3% compared to Innodata's net margin of -8.33%. Innodata's return on equity of 67.04% beat NCR Voyix's return on equity of 88.84%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $46.75, signalling upside risk potential of 1.13%. On the other hand NCR Voyix has an analysts' consensus of $19.64 which suggests that it could grow by 19.58%. Given that NCR Voyix has higher upside potential than Innodata, analysts believe NCR Voyix is more attractive than Innodata.

Innodata has a beta of 2.558, which suggesting that the stock is 155.788% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Voyix has a beta of 1.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.637%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Voyix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix pays out -3.55% of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than NCR Voyix quarterly revenues of $711M. Innodata's net income of $17.4M is lower than NCR Voyix's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.42x while NCR Voyix's PE ratio is 3.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 10.42x versus 0.53x for NCR Voyix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zvelo has a net margin of 33.3% compared to Innodata's net margin of --. Innodata's return on equity of 67.04% beat Zvelo's return on equity of --.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $46.75, signalling upside risk potential of 1.13%. On the other hand Zvelo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Zvelo, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Zvelo.

Innodata has a beta of 2.558, which suggesting that the stock is 155.788% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zvelo has a beta of -0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.89%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zvelo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zvelo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are larger than Zvelo quarterly revenues of --. Innodata's net income of $17.4M is higher than Zvelo's net income of --. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.42x while Zvelo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 10.42x versus -- for Zvelo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.