RAMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innodata has a net margin of 5.74% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of 17.4%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.01% beat Innodata's return on equity of 75.22%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.29, signalling upside risk potential of 53.64%. On the other hand Innodata has an analysts' consensus of $74.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.54%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innodata has a beta of 2.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.365%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innodata offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innodata pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $195.4M, which are larger than Innodata quarterly revenues of $59.2M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $11.2M is higher than Innodata's net income of $10.3M. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,557.00x while Innodata's PE ratio is 50.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.36x versus 7.92x for Innodata. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasystems has a net margin of 5.74% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of 24.26%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.01% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 22.16%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.29, signalling upside risk potential of 53.64%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $105.36 which suggests that it could grow by 54.63%. Given that Pegasystems has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe Pegasystems is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.778%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $195.4M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $490.8M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $11.2M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $119.1M. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,557.00x while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 67.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.36x versus 4.12x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Voyix has a net margin of 5.74% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of -1.61%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.01% beat NCR Voyix's return on equity of 148.57%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.29, signalling upside risk potential of 53.64%. On the other hand NCR Voyix has an analysts' consensus of $15.89 which suggests that it could grow by 66.2%. Given that NCR Voyix has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe NCR Voyix is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Voyix has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.118%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Voyix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix pays out 1.57% of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $195.4M, which are smaller than NCR Voyix quarterly revenues of $682M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $11.2M is higher than NCR Voyix's net income of -$11M. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,557.00x while NCR Voyix's PE ratio is 1.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.36x versus 0.44x for NCR Voyix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zvelo has a net margin of 5.74% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of --. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.01% beat Zvelo's return on equity of --.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.29, signalling upside risk potential of 53.64%. On the other hand Zvelo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LiveRamp Holdings has higher upside potential than Zvelo, analysts believe LiveRamp Holdings is more attractive than Zvelo.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zvelo has a beta of 0.075, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.472%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zvelo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zvelo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $195.4M, which are larger than Zvelo quarterly revenues of --. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $11.2M is higher than Zvelo's net income of --. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,557.00x while Zvelo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.36x versus -- for Zvelo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.