LAZR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Miller Industries has a net margin of -793.92% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of 4.91%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 479.15%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.47%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.533, which suggesting that the stock is 53.3% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.733%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $314.3M. Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M is higher than Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 11.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 2.05x versus 0.59x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -793.92% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of -125.86%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 479.15%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.03 which suggests that it could grow by 6.92%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.533, which suggesting that the stock is 53.3% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 2.05x versus 3.05x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of -793.92% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of --. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 479.15%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.85%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than SES AI.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.533, which suggesting that the stock is 53.3% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of --. Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 2.05x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -793.92% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of -132.43%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 479.15%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 109.33%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Worksport, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Worksport.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.533, which suggesting that the stock is 53.3% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.973%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M is higher than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 2.05x versus 3.12x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.