HOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -793.92%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $41.94, signalling upside risk potential of 22%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 479.15%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.471, which suggesting that the stock is 47.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.3%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M is higher than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.94x while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.75x versus 2.05x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 4.91%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84% beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $41.94, signalling upside risk potential of 22%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.47%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.471, which suggesting that the stock is 47.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.733%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $314.3M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M is higher than Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.94x while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 11.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.75x versus 0.59x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of --. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84% beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $41.94, signalling upside risk potential of 22%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.85%. Given that SES AI has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe SES AI is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.471, which suggesting that the stock is 47.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of --. Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.94x while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.75x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -132.43%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $41.94, signalling upside risk potential of 22%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 109.33%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.471, which suggesting that the stock is 47.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.973%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M is higher than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.94x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.75x versus 3.12x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.