HOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Malibu Boats has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 1.18%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -16.06%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $31.22, signalling upside risk potential of 22.06%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of $43.71 which suggests that it could grow by 48.23%. Given that Malibu Boats has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Malibu Boats is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.496%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are larger than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $200.3M. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Malibu Boats's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.65x versus 0.81x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 4.75%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $31.22, signalling upside risk potential of 22.06%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $70.50 which suggests that it could grow by 60.74%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.092%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are larger than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $221.9M. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 7.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.65x versus 0.40x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 0.6%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Polaris's return on equity of 8.17%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $31.22, signalling upside risk potential of 22.06%. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $51.77 which suggests that it could grow by 24.39%. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.843%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Polaris offers a yield of 6.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Polaris's is not.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Polaris's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Polaris's PE ratio is 21.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.65x versus 0.33x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -132.43%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $31.22, signalling upside risk potential of 22.06%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $12.17 which suggests that it could grow by 234.25%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.903, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 190.297%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.65x versus 1.36x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.