LOPE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 11.06%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 30.82% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 12.62%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $158.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.08%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $101.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.72%. Given that Adtalem Global Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Adtalem Global Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.113%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $238.3M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $417.4M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $41.5M is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $46.2M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 20.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 4.64x versus 2.11x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 3.46%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 30.82% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $158.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.08%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.12%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.214%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $238.3M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $114.4M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $41.5M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 48.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 4.64x versus 1.12x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 22.53%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 30.82% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 15.25%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $158.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.08%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.47%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.878%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 9.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $238.3M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $41.5M is higher than Perdoceo Education's net income of $38.3M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 13.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 4.64x versus 2.69x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 9.07%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 30.82% beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 7.63%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $158.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.08%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $123.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.69%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.587, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.32%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 84.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $238.3M, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $306M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $41.5M is higher than Strategic Education's net income of $27.7M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 17.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 4.64x versus 1.84x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.